Just curious, LHB58 at #68, did you really have to look?
Insulting comments
Sort:
dredmylox wrote:
@Nekidonadonkey: So narcistic was meant as an insult? What kind of Indian are you?
Me: no. Narcistic only refers to the nature of your comment. If i was an indian, my preference would be Apache.
{ hicetnunc wrote:
Also user *** is a returning cheater (previously known as ****), so I wouldn't bother talking to him. }
how come the mods allow these vigilantes to continue breaking site rules ?
Dec 26, 2014
0
#85
Always interesting to see how many users (often with a recent account) don't like to hear about cheaters or returning cheaters...
This one has a very lofty 2300+ standard rating. I'm sure his games are very instructive...
It could be your upbringing that's the problem, but you should be moderated for your BS. Oh btw, I didn't ask for those extra 400 points. You should complain to the site for doing everything against your better judgement! Lol!
[COMMENT DELETED]
What??? That's my popcorn!!! Not fair!!! Get your own!!! *takes popcorn back*
Dec 26, 2014
0
#90
Interesting. Some users, despite having no experience detecting cheaters and being very recent on the site think they can label my warnings regarding other users they don't know anything about as 'bullshit'.
I wonder why someone not involved would feel the need to react like this. I really wonder...
"We can't go on together
With suspicious minds!!"
For such a useless game, you take it really seriously.
Man up dude, don't spend the rest of your life crying over a kids game.
There are plenty of cheats on the site, true. I even gave up playing correspondence because I don't enjoy playing engines either. It's boring! But you have a problem you really should deal with. Yourpost about that member was pathetic, but carry on if you need to. It's just childish that's all, and against site rules. But what do you care ? You're a vigilante, right ?
I don't like seeing members abused, but it means nothing to you I'd say.
I checked this one out thinking they were giving some decent insults to use , how dissapointing.
Dec 26, 2014
0
#93
@SwedishTuna : thanks for sharing your worthless, anonymous and uninformed opinion and lecturing me about abuse after your numerous personal attacks.
I suggest you resume posting half-naked pictures of your favourite pornstars on your profile and stop pretending you know what the word 'respect' means.
Ah, and I got a screen grab of your filthy artwork in 115, that you've wisely removed. Just in case...
Get your nappy changed and stop bawling, ya silly goose!
hicetnunc wrote:
Interesting. Some users, despite having no experience detecting cheaters and being very recent on the site think they can label my warnings regarding other users they don't know anything about as 'bullshit'.
I wonder why someone not involved would feel the need to react like this. I really wonder...
Unless it is explicitly your job, I don't believe that you should ever accuse anyone of being a cheater even if they clearly are. It's deeply rude.
@hicetnunc: the real cheaters are the ones that try to steal your money to repair the teeth of a grandmasters wife. Chess is just a game. The fact that you boast about snapshots to be used against somebody is very revealing. I would stop the lessons in respectfulness and look in the mirror.
Sport is an activity involving physical exertion and skill.
And NASCAR
online chess has no referee!
Rickett2222 wrote:
dredmylox wrote:
@Rickett2222;
Then disagree we shall. This professor recited a story, which was offered as a complete truth, almost a parable! Clearly it is stated "a large empty mayonnaise jar", which was not empty at all! The students had this story programmed into their minds, they believe they have received full information and never question it, the story remains faulty and those programmed with it, propagate it. This is proven by people reciting the same faulty story, they haven't thought outside of this story and develop cognitive dissonance about it, defending faulty logic as if it is complete and correct, which it is not.
The glass is half full of water, and half full of air, therefore it is full.
Not sure if your logic supersedes your intelligence or vice versa. So why was the jar not empty may I ask?
Is the jar full of air already full in your mind? And if it is then you are missing the components that can fill a jar with more then empty space full of air.
http://members.optushome.com.au/davidquinn000/Diogenes%20Folder/Diogenes.html
Look for the one that starts with "Plato was discoursing..."
Stop plaing with this oponent