Trash talkers can have fun playing Chess too, and that's OK, but they never get beyond a certain rating and that's OK too. They will just never become Grand Masters. Their ratings will only get lower and lower over time. That's what I mean when I say that in the end, they are losers. I did not mean that as an insult.
Insulting comments
Sort:
Ok. Let's play a game and see your trash talk.
Most sites that allow comments have a way to report comments that are contrary to the sites Terms of Service (TOS). The TOS is pretty clear about not allowing offensive content. The remedy can include being banned.
Wonder why they don't make it easier to report offensive content. Doesn't make a lot of sense to have that as part of your TOS, but then not let your user community help you do the grunt work of sorting out the chaff.
@Tracer2960 You making a complain about rude comments. Then why you just called me a "sandbagger" a few minutes ago in a bullet game? I guess is very easy for people like you to throw rude comments via a computer screen since they don't risk any loss of tooth or teeth that way. Cheers @Tracer2960 you have great manners also and even more of a manful behavior.
Yiannis_Ayiannis wrote:
@Tracer2960 You making a complain about rude comments. Then why you just called me a "sandbagger" a few minutes ago in a bullet game? I guess is very easy for people like you to throw rude comments via a computer screen since they don't risk any loss of tooth or teeth that way. Cheers @Tracer2960 you have great manners also and even more of a manful behavior.
Sandbagger is not a rude comment. It is an accusation that you are playing below your actual skill level.
kleelof wrote:
Yiannis_Ayiannis wrote:
@Tracer2960 You making a complain about rude comments. Then why you just called me a "sandbagger" a few minutes ago in a bullet game? I guess is very easy for people like you to throw rude comments via a computer screen since they don't risk any loss of tooth or teeth that way. Cheers @Tracer2960 you have great manners also and even more of a manful behavior.
Sandbagger is not a rude comment. It is an accusation that you are playing below your actual skill level.
Really??? Then who played like that? Have a look
http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=1136267585
Anyway, I thinks Tracer is a provocative person and he deserves the same attitude. He should take it on the chin at least and not make complains like a cry baby. I didn't reply to him, I just blocked him.
I didn't say you were a sandbagger. I was just telling you that it is not a rude comment, just an accusation.
You did the right thing by blocking and moving on. People like this just want to get back at you because they can't accept they suck at chess.
kleelof wrote:
I didn't say you were a sandbagger. I was just telling you that it is not a rude comment, just an accusation.
You did the right thing by blocking and moving on. People like this just want to get back at you because they can't accept they suck at chess.
I know you didn't my friend. But I want to point out that people who complain about others for being rude at least they must have the decency to behave themselves in a right manner. That's the only reason I' m wasting my time with this person and posting here. So much hypocrisy and inferiority complex.
mauve_penguin wrote:
LHB58 wrote:
Unfortunately I can't think of anybody I dislike just because of their country of origin.
I don't think anybody should
4 months later
I don't think anybody could have a real reason to do so, let me rephrase that.
Herebrocker wrote:
i know some languages
...and English is not my specialty.
May 21, 2015
0
#133
Yiannis_Ayiannis wrote:
kleelof wrote:
Yiannis_Ayiannis wrote:
@Tracer2960 You making a complain about rude comments. Then why you just called me a "sandbagger" a few minutes ago in a bullet game? I guess is very easy for people like you to throw rude comments via a computer screen since they don't risk any loss of tooth or teeth that way. Cheers @Tracer2960 you have great manners also and even more of a manful behavior.
Sandbagger is not a rude comment. It is an accusation that you are playing below your actual skill level.
Really??? Then who played like that? Have a look
http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=1136267585
Anyway, I thinks Tracer is a provocative person and he deserves the same attitude. He should take it on the chin at least and not make complains like a cry baby. I didn't reply to him, I just blocked him.
First, you are a sandbagger. You play bullet and having a rating of 1425, while at the same time you have 2055 rating in online chess. So, if you are not a sangbagger then I don't know who is. It was not an insult, but a pure fact in your case. The only other reason I can think of is that you cheat in online chess and having that kind of rating (if you are not a sandbagger).
Second, the true reason why I am a thorn in your eye is not because I'm "provocative" or "insulting", but because you lost a game by a single move against me and can't handle it. So, in fact, you are the one here who cries like a baby, bitching and whining over something you can't get over, but trying to make me look like that.
I have not come here to argue against someone whom I lost the game trying to make him look bad just because I lost by a single move. That says much more about you then me.
2000 online is not hard if you just think a long time
1400 bullet and 2000 online is not sandbagging at all
May 21, 2015
0
#135
Then we can also say that 2500 is not that hard "if you just think a long time" 
. Some people think "long time" over 20 years and never get to 2000 rating.
Having over 600 points difference is just too much for one player to have, regardless of the time constrains he has in the game. So, he is obviously a sandbagger or a cheater. Not much else to say about that.
Not really, I am 1860 in online, and 2000 in blitz, and I at the most use 1 minute at my moves, these people may use an hour or more per move?
skotheim2 wrote:
2000 online is not hard if you just think a long time
Based on the players here, including myself, I would say this is bullshit.
@Tracer I only play bullet unrated because I want to avoid losses from clockplayers like you. You are weaker than me, your tactics are weak, your moves are weak.You are just a fast clicker. Most games we played together you won on time when you had a completely lost position.
1.http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=1136267585
You' re completely lost but you won on time
2.http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=1096753940
You lost to 1400 player, I guess your fast clicking strategy didn't work for you. At least you should have the decency to resing but that's too much for you.
3.http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=1028325583
lol, the final move was very interesting,time burnersssss.
4.http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=976131737
You won in a clear manner and I resigned
5.http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=937427821
You were completely outplayed by a low rated player but again you won on time lol
6.http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=627909528
That game was ridiculus, such a high rate with so weak tactics and cheap tricks just to flag the opponent. Again no decency for resignation. Too bad it didn't work for you.
7.http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=627909528
Drawn position, you won on time but that game is ok.
8.http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=592182504
If I had time Ne2+ kills you on the spot but again "time burnersssss".
In conclusion @Tracer you are a really bad player for your rating. On the other hand even tho I play bullet I try not to make idiotic moves just to flag my opponent, I play the position and not the clock even in bullet.
May 22, 2015
0
#139
Guess what sandbagger - 1 min game is a game where time is a factor. If you were that good you would use your better position and won the game. But, you didn't! So, stop bitching and whining and take it like a man! Don't play 1 min games if you can't handle faster games and players. Nobody here cares about "i was better then him every time but I lost". You lost! Period! Even so, you lost 6 times! But still repeating like a broken record "i was better!".
Tracer2960 wrote:
Guess what sandbagger - 1 min game is a game where time is a factor. If you were that good you would use your better position and won the game. But, you didn't! So, stop bitching and whining and take it like a man! Don't play 1 min games if you can't handle faster games and players. Nobody here cares about "i was better then him every time but I lost". You lost! Period! Even so, you lost 6 times! But still repeating like a broken record "i was better!".
Well, isn't that ironic considering the origin of the thread.
It's actualy a little unfair because I have a daughter, a mother, and a sister...
So you're saying you're a girly man who sits down when he pees?
I'd really like to respond but we start some trash-talking thing on a forum and we will get banned...
That's fine. My trash talk is really crap without a chessboard in front of me. I mean, really, 'girly man who sits down when he pees'? Pretty weak.