Is Chess.com Allowed to Read Our Messages

Sort:
DiogenesDue
batgirl wrote:

Reading other people's messages.... who the heck would want that slimey job?

Lots of sockpuppets here :).  Then their conspiracy theories could finally be confirmed...

batgirl

As long as it's not my job to wade through it all....

DiogenesDue
TheGrobe wrote:

I've been a user of both Lotus and Exchange.  from a user's standpoint there's no comparison.  Exchange is by far the superior platform.

As administration goes, the guys who administer Exchange (and more recently Office 365) work for me -- I've never had to administer it myself.

My sympathies.  Managing sysadmins is something I would not wish on anybody :)...

LoekBergman

@TheGrobe: oh yeah, heard it before that people found Exchange much better to work with. It is much more intuitive indeed, but technically? Exactly the other way around.

Way back we had for instance an old laptop to serve 600 Lotus Notes accounts (and a lot of applications within Lotus Notes), where the other half of the company needed three full fledged dedicated mailservers.

I_Am_Second
chessdex wrote:

If they are, at what times, or just whenever they like? Also, can they tell other people about someone else's messages? Just curious

If you had read the TOS when you signed up, you would know the answer.

RonaldJosephCote

             Did someone want to ask me something??

chessdex

What?

kco
Cheddarman1 wrote:

chessdex, what the hell are you talking about? Admins don't go around reading random peoples messages let alone telling others about members about the content of the messages for no reason. Don't you think that they have better things to do with their time?

Honestly...

+1

macer75
kco wrote:
Cheddarman1 wrote:

chessdex, what the hell are you talking about? Admins don't go around reading random peoples messages let alone telling others about members about the content of the messages for no reason. Don't you think that they have better things to do with their time?

Honestly...

+1

-1

SocialPanda
macer75 wrote:
kco wrote:
Cheddarman1 wrote:

chessdex, what the hell are you talking about? Admins don't go around reading random peoples messages let alone telling others about members about the content of the messages for no reason. Don't you think that they have better things to do with their time?

Honestly...

+1

-1

*1

chessdex
socialista wrote:
macer75 wrote:
kco wrote:
Cheddarman1 wrote:

chessdex, what the hell are you talking about? Admins don't go around reading random peoples messages let alone telling others about members about the content of the messages for no reason. Don't you think that they have better things to do with their time?

Honestly...

+1

-1

*1

Square root 1

chessdex
[COMMENT DELETED]
chessdex
chessdex wrote:
socialista wrote:
macer75 wrote:
kco wrote:
Cheddarman1 wrote:

chessdex, what the hell are you talking about? Admins don't go around reading random peoples messages let alone telling others about members about the content of the messages for no reason. Don't you think that they have better things to do with their time?

Honestly...

+1

-1

*1

Square root 1

What do we do next?

I_Am_Second
chessdex wrote:
chessdex wrote:
socialista wrote:
macer75 wrote:
kco wrote:
Cheddarman1 wrote:

chessdex, what the hell are you talking about? Admins don't go around reading random peoples messages let alone telling others about members about the content of the messages for no reason. Don't you think that they have better things to do with their time?

Honestly...

+1

-1

*1

Square root 1

What do we do next?

Enter the matrix?

chessdex

Sure!

I_Am_Second
chessdex wrote:

Sure!


Lets all put on our glasses...long coats...quit smiling...and plug that doohicky into the back of our necks...a...n...d...g...o...r...e...a...l...s...l...o...w...

chessdex

0......k......

einstein99

There might be some greater truth to that movie

chessdex

Like what?

I_Am_Second
chessdex wrote:

0......k......


I forgot to mention, to use alot of slow hand gestures...