Well played against a complete idiot. 
Malicious player
Sort:
I agree with dalephilly.
Support said these people are detected automatically by server huristics or something like that - but I think since this guy openly admits it is intentional - there's no need to have him do this to enough people for servers detection to be satisfied... I think on this occastion a manual block of a player is in order.
[COMMENT DELETED]
lol happens to be all the time...
If you could post his name we could all block him. Maybe he'd get the message when he couldn't get any play.
Solution: don't play long games.
checkmateibeatu wrote:
Solution: don't play long games.
Or at least not rated ones. Another solution is to block and report the member.
0
#10
checkmateibeatu wrote:
Solution: don't play long games.
You shouldn't let a few idiots stop you from playing the type of games you want. (this post is for everyone else not you cmibu, I know you never admit you're wrong about anything).
fissionfowl wrote:
checkmateibeatu wrote:
Solution: don't play long games.
You shouldn't let a few idiots stop you from playing the type of games you want. (this post is for everyone else not you cmibu, I know you never admit you're wrong about anything).
As said in the next post, blocking works.
0
#12
checkmateibeatu wrote:
fissionfowl wrote:
checkmateibeatu wrote:
Solution: don't play long games.
You shouldn't let a few idiots stop you from playing the type of games you want. (this post is for everyone else not you cmibu, I know you never admit you're wrong about anything).
As said in the next post, blocking works.
You also said "or at least not long ones", so sticking with your statement.
fissionfowl wrote:
checkmateibeatu wrote:
fissionfowl wrote:
checkmateibeatu wrote:
Solution: don't play long games.
You shouldn't let a few idiots stop you from playing the type of games you want. (this post is for everyone else not you cmibu, I know you never admit you're wrong about anything).
As said in the next post, blocking works.
You also said "or at least not long ones", so sticking with your statement.
- At least not rated ones, I said
- Blocking is indeed the best answer, which is why I added it.
It's a good thing you did as only your posts are visibile to chess.com members. Nobody else could read that echecs and sftac had already given out the "blocking" advice.
Thanks Li'l Nappy!
bigpoison wrote:
It's a good thing you did as only your posts are visibile to chess.com members. Nobody else could read that echecs and sftac had already given out the "blocking" advice.
Thanks Li'l Nappy!
I don't read the whole thread before posting, only a quick glance of the OP, to see what they are talking about.
"The whole thread" was 10 posts long. Is reading that so much of a burden?
I see no need. It won't kill anyone if they reiterate anything.
Reading the OP is enough in my eyes.
If you can't be bothered to read the forum thread, don't post in it.
Please Sign Up to comment.
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.
I just encountered a player that once he knows he lost - stalls for the rest of the clock. It was a 30 minute game he created - so my guess is he usually does that.
It's not an innocent occurance - he simply said: "You can wait 28 minutes"
His notes on personal page also suggest it. I added my own - but not going to check opponent page each time I want to play a game. I'm a mediocre player and can understand the frustration of getting beaten to dust in this site... but this is just spiteful... how can I report him or add to some kind of ignore list so that I will not mistakenly have to play him again?
For the record - here's the game, his notes on user page and the game chat:
[It is against site policy to accuse other members by name in the public forum. If you have a complaint to make, report it directly to chess.com via the Help&Support link at the bottom of any page.
Moderator]