Moving into check
Whoever loses the king first loses. Period. Black would lose the king one move earlier, therefore he loses.
The only reason the rook can't move is because of the rule about not moving into check. If you remove that rule to let the black king take the white queen, then the black king dies first when the rook moves to take it. Leaving the rule means that black can't take the queen. Either way, black loses.
Try this one:
Black played 1. ... Bb7+ and announced mate in two.
White gave him a funny look and replied with 2. e4 checkmate.
Black insisted "No, that isn't checkmate... I just take your Pawn en-passent, and it's White that's in checkmate, not Black".
White pointed out that Black cannot play fxe3 e.p. while he is in check by White's Bishop.
Black claimed "But your e-Pawn never reached the e4 square... it was captured en-passent on e3. So it never blocked my original check. You lose".
Call the Tournament Director. What does he say?
Ahah that's funny!
I think white wins. Because even if the pawn is supposed to be taken-en-passant, in the rules, it still requires black to play fxe3 while in check which he can't.
Ahah that's funny!
I think white wins. Because even if the pawn is supposed to be taken-en-passant, in the rules, it still requires black to play fxe3 while in check which he can't.
Correct. According to FIDE rules, "A move is completed when the player's hand releases the piece on its destination square"... it says nothing about waiting to see if the opponent takes it en-passent.
So the White Pawn did arrive on e4 to block the check.