OK. OK. I was just drawing attention to the fact that he said this is not a post about proving a point and then he went on to prove a point. (or at least try)
Anyway, if his point is that you can sometimes, under certain circumstances, win when you are down a queen, then he has proven that point, as trivial and obvious as it may be.
Peace to all, and good night!
No he hasn't. Of course you can win if you lose your Queen early, but not against a serious opponent.
When I play the kids at my local chess club, I literally wipe all the Queenside pieces and pawns off the board, and start the game with only King, light-colored Bishop, Knight, Rook, and 4 pawns against the entire army. And I play as Black.
And you know what? Yes, I still win/draw some of those games.
But no tournament-level player will hang his or her Queen in the opening, and is more than capable of dispatching someone who effectively starts without a Queen with bored precision. If you cannot understand this, then you have very little understanding of real chess.