Wrongly given brilliant in game review

Sort:
Avatar of lolmax090

I played this game where upon completion it said "? Brilliant" so I naturally clicked on game review to find out which move it wasHowever upon reviewing it shows 0 BrilliantsGame url https://www.chess.com/game/145064794914

Why are you misleading people into using their free daily game review limit?? A lot of people around my ELO are excited when they get a brilliant. They want to see which move it was.

IMO this is unethical behavior. This has started happening recently. 

Avatar of proKingchessmate

Same problem but you can have unlimited game reviews on chesssigma website visit there.

Avatar of Martin_Stahl

The post game analysis is lower strength and can't guarantee there's a brilliant, just that there's a move that sacrifices material or allows material to be captured. Until a full strength review is run it can't tell for sure if the move was good or best

Avatar of lolmax090
Martin_Stahl wrote:

The post game analysis is lower strength and can't guarantee there's a brilliant, just that there's a move that sacrifices material or allow material to be captured. Until a full strength review is run it can't tell for sure if the move was good or best

This wasn't the case 2-3 months ago. Back then you would know how many brilliants you got (if any) right away. I think you should remove "? Brilliant" since it's clickbait. It seems obvious to me that this is a cunning way to exhaust daily free game reviews.

Imagine I tell someone you've won the lottery only to later reveal you've actually won 0 dollars. This system is like that.

Avatar of Martin_Stahl
lolmax090 wrote:

This wasn't the case 2-3 months ago. Back then you would know how many brilliants you got (if any) right away. I think you should remove "? Brilliant" since it's clickbait. It seems obvious to me that this is a cunning way to exhaust daily free game reviews.

Imagine I tell someone you've won the lottery only to later reveal you've actually won 0 dollars. This system is like that.

That number wasn't always correct. The values were determined from a faster evaluation and a full review could and often would have a different result.

Avatar of Chessiosaurus

It feels like the game reviews are very generous at times, like they are more geared towards making us feel good about our game then perhaps being a little more brutally harsh in the way stockfish would be if you analyzed with it off site

Avatar of x_nrt
Game reviews aren’t generous. Not with brilliants, not with best. However, it dishes out greats like there’s no tomorrow!
Avatar of Pudding
xneret wrote:
Game reviews aren’t generous. Not with brilliants, not with best. However, it dishes out greats like there’s no tomorrow!

Yes they do