Always move as fast as you can.
Laughter after chess game
Sort:
DrinkingLikeTal wrote:
Always move as fast as you can.
I play bullet chess with a touchpad mouse since my mouse broke.
Now I am terribly slow :/
Sep 4, 2015
0
#24
Lenudan wrote:
PawnRaider1936 wrote:
Lenudan wrote:
Not sure what to correct first...Exclusively playing bullet to learn openings while admitting you're deficient in positional play or avoiding longer time controls because of the 'huge mass of cheaters' conspiring against you..lol.. Sounds like your allowing a totally meaningless chess.com rating to dictate your training.
New players who start with blitz or faster have a really hard time transferring to 'real chess' controls as thier entire 'toolbox' consists of shallow 2-3 move trick tactics that have little to no application in tourament play. I hope for your sake that chess.com is just a small fraction of your total playing time!
I play exclusively on chess.com. I play blitz as well. Bullet high 1953 and Blitz high 1843 so its not like im using wild gambit opennings to win my games. I know most openings 10-15 deep so if you decide to stray from sound moves with me you will most likely pay for it. I make sound developmental moves and make sure im castled. Openning knowledge seperates average players from great ones and right now im just working on that. And if you pay attention to what i wrote i never said there was a mass of cheaters i just said i would prefer not to encounter them and if i do for it to be in a very small percentage like 1 every 100. I wouldnt call the ratings on here meaningless. I have played many games with CM up to GM and have won quite a few games solely on my openings knowledge and basic tactics knowledge. I have a 2/6/1 record against WGMCamillaB, a 4/2/1 record against FMKBachler, and a 2/0/0 record against NMchess_player_17 to name a few so if im able to defeat these Titled players i have to be doing something right
I'll take 'What is Vain" for 1000 Alex!
Just speaking facts man. Debunking your assumption that what im doing is meaningless. If it was, i wouldnt have started at 800-900 bullet and gotten over 1900 in 4 years of moderate study. Im full confident had i not been working 50-60 hours a week for 4 years i would be GM right now. Confidence in what im doing is all and backing it up with facts
Sep 4, 2015
0
#25
Sorry pawn.. but no one has or ever will become a GM playing bullet on chess.com. just like no Tennis player will ever win Wimbledon with a background exclusivly in racketball.. I mean you obviously have talent for bullet chess, but as I said before, expertise in bullet just doesnt correlate to tournament time controls.. which you would have to play to ever become a GM. To become a GM You need an ELO of 2500 (in tournament time controls = 90 min for 40 moves, then 30 min for rest of the game), then get your norms from playing and winning against other GM's not only in your country but internationally
Sep 4, 2015
0
#26
Lenudan wrote:
Sorry pawn.. but no one has or ever will become a GM playing bullet on chess.com. just like no Tennis player will ever win Wimbledon with a background exclusivly in racketball.. I mean you obviously have talent for bullet chess, but as I said before, expertise in bullet just doesnt correlate to tournament time controls.. which you would have to play to ever become a GM. To become a GM You need an ELO of 2500 (in tournament time controls = 90 min for 40 moves, then 30 min for rest of the game), then get your norms from playing and winning against other GM's not only in your country but internationally
Im familair with the qualifications and once this does happen you will see that it is possible
Sep 4, 2015
0
#27
There is a huge difference between going from 900 to 1900 and from 1900 to 2900.
That said this thread has outlived its purpose
Tactics tactics and more tactics
This thread is funny, considering the the OP cried and claimed I was a cheater and that I lost after I checkmated him:
https://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=1694256275
Aug 17, 2016
0
#30
Chess_Commission wrote:
This thread is funny, considering the the OP cried and claimed I was a cheater and that I lost after I checkmated him:
https://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=1694256275
I'm glad you posted this game. It gives anyone a chance to look over the game to see that you had given away your rook at move 16. dropping pawns and your rook showing that your position is slowly being grinded away by yours truly.
PawnRaider1936 wrote:
Chess_Commission wrote:
This thread is funny, considering the the OP cried and claimed I was a cheater and that I lost after I checkmated him:
https://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=1694256275
I'm glad you posted this game. It gives anyone a chance to look over the game to see that you had given away your rook at move 16. dropping pawns and your rook showing that your position is slowly being grinded away by yours truly.
The game is irrelevant, it's the childish comments you toss at people after you lose. I only posted the game link because for some reason you claimed that I 'lost' to you, before you started talking trash. Learn to deal with a loss man! It's internet chess, not real life. You're sitting behind a computer screen, but you act like a meaningless game of online bullet chess is Game 7 of the NBA Championship. Believe me, not one person with a membership on this website cares about your record against oppponents in unrated games. Seriously, learn to have some class and little bit of sportsmanship; and please don't post about people being rude to you when you dish it out just as bad as those that you point fingers at...
this is an old forum, why be a necromancer and ressurrect it?
Oct 7, 2016
0
#33
ElvenQuill wrote:
Have to agree. I dislike timers in general, they're one of the few reasons I'm at a low ranking right now. In person I kept an aquaintance who was a chess mentor occupied for at least an hour and a half (and lol, not all of that time was me thinking), without a clock, and I still have the notation, I hope to finish that game in the near future. Point being, yeeeah. Timers=Mental constipation, Bullet=profuse bleeding emmenating from a badly abused brain.
AKAL1 wrote:
Bullet is not chess.
Oct 8, 2016
0
#35
One piece of advice I saw in a bullet theory book: "to save time, move pieces that are close to your clock". Brilliant! 
AKAL1 a écrit :
Bullet is not chess.
Stockfish might say that about 120 mn game.
ReddyJ a écrit :
this is an old forum, why be a necromancer and ressurrect it?
Some subjects will never be old fashioned. I'm not sure it would a better idea to open a second thread rather than continuing the first one.
Aug 2, 2017
0
#38
Lookit all the insecurity in this topic. I'm happy to keep JAJAJAing at pawnraider, jaja.
rjbuffchix wrote:
Lookit all the insecurity in this topic. I'm happy to keep JAJAJAing at pawnraider, jaja.
Insecurity is necroing a year old thread to take a jab at someone. Move on with your little life.
Easy fix:
Move faster