My friend didnt en passant

Sort:
Avatar of ryanhodgkinson

MY FRIEND REFUSED AN EN PASSANT IT WAS RIGHT THERE AND HE ACKNOWLEDGED IT? SHOULD I BURN HIM????

Avatar of Chess_Player_lol

get a new friend

Avatar of Benjamin_3098

I recommend medium well. It cooks best.

Avatar of davidbolla
Most of the players doesn’t even realize it. Also burn them?
Avatar of KieferSmith

maybe en passant just wasn't the best decision...? 🙄

Avatar of achanach2
Avatar of Sharp2Axe

Aight, if not enpassanting is illegal, why do I still have friends? wink

Avatar of Chess_Player_lol
Sharp2Axe wrote:

Aight, if not enpassanting is illegal, why do I still have friends?

FIDE hasn't arrested them yet? you better give up their location so they can arrest them for this greivous offense.

Avatar of asto0239
ryanhodgkinson wrote:

MY FRIEND REFUSED AN EN PASSANT IT WAS RIGHT THERE AND HE ACKNOWLEDGED IT? SHOULD I BURN HIM????

An en passant? That may be a blunder.

Avatar of asto0239
KieferSmith wrote:

maybe en passant just wasn't the best decision...? 🙄

YEA

Avatar of Ralph_PN

:troll

Avatar of nbrasington
KieferSmith wrote:

maybe en passant just wasn't the best decision...? 🙄

En passant is always the best decision.

Avatar of albusbluderdore
HOW CAN EN PASSENT NOT BE THE BEST DECISION?
Avatar of eric0022
vinaygore wrote:
HOW CAN EN PASSENT NOT BE THE BEST DECISION?

See post #5.

Avatar of eric0022
ryanhodgkinson wrote:

MY FRIEND REFUSED AN EN PASSANT IT WAS RIGHT THERE AND HE ACKNOWLEDGED IT? SHOULD I BURN HIM????

I could say the same when you failed to promote a pawn to a lesser piece.

Avatar of arosbishop

A serious question. Must I do en passent or can i chose to ignore it? I have not checked the chess rules about this. Anyone know for a fact?

Avatar of eric0022
arosbishop wrote:

A serious question. Must I do en passent or can i chose to ignore it? I have not checked the chess rules about this. Anyone know for a fact?

En passant is not a forced move (unless that is the only legal option available). As such, we can ignore the en passant move if we prefer. Note, however, that this right to perform en passant is lost once we make a different move (i.e. we will not be able to perform the same en passant move again, even a turn later).

Avatar of arosbishop

Thank you for the answer eric0022.

Avatar of SAMRUDHASHRESTHA987654321
#5 is correct if your friend en passant you can eat your friend’s rook
Avatar of 7antony

I'm wondering, en passant describes the situation while pawn quickly enters the battle due to going at two positions immediately. Unfortunately, it becomes vulnerable, according to the rules, to opponent's pawn. In case the pawn starts from 2nd horisontal forpost, it previosely steps on the next quad and the last simultaniosely! Another pawn can destroy the former as well as it is surrounded on 3rd, not 4th horisontal. In the conclusion, pawns goes only one quad by one as a king. No one quit without a battle, thanks!