5/15/2016 - The King of Patzers' Checkmate
Sort:
Animated GIF made by NIKPRIT (TKS)!!
trysts wrote:
Got it the first try! Maid of the king of patzers
LOL !! The Kingdom of Patzers does not have a queen yet.
You can join the group below and become THE QUEEN:
https://www.chess.com/groups/home/the-kingdom-of-patzers
Until now this is the organogram of The Kingdom of Patzers:
Lol
MarcoBR444 wrote:
Until now this is the organogram of The Kingdom of Patzers:
The what?
macer75 wrote:
MarcoBR444 wrote:
Until now this is the organogram of The Kingdom of Patzers:
The what?
Organogram = organization's chart.
May 15, 2016
0
#9
A really nice checkmate - doesn't seem "patzer" at all.
Seeing that you've also beaten Robert - maybe it's time to consider switching to "king of the intermediate players" - although it does lack that original flavor...
By the way - I tried 1...Ne2+ which would amount to the same...
solskytz wrote:
A really nice checkmate - doesn't seem "patzer" at all.
Seeing that you've also beaten Robert - maybe it's time to consider switching to "king of the intermediate players" - although it does lack that original flavor...
By the way - I tried 1...Ne2+ which would amount to the same...
It is only a flash of brilliancy. I still blunder a lot in my games.
May 15, 2016
0
#11
So do I, Marco, so do I :-)
Welcome to the real world
Everybody blunders!
An Israeli FM friend of mine (who is easily IM level, at least in blitz, but mostly inactive already) used to say - "I'm nothing but an improved patzer".
With the advent of computer technology - aren't we all?
solskytz wrote:
So do I, Marco, so do I :-)
Welcome to the real world
Everybody blunders!
An Israeli FM friend of mine (who is easily IM level, at least in blitz, but mostly inactive already) used to say - "I'm nothing but an improved patzer".
With the advent of computer technology - aren't we all?
Interesting.
I know about that.
Once I saw this video and it enphatizes what your friend GM said.
This video is nice because we can feel better about the blunders, because even the top GM blunder too!!
May 15, 2016
0
#13
I think I've seen this video :-)
But any experienced player knows many such famous examples.
Apart from this recent Anand-Carlsen thing (which is actually quite advanced for a blunder - nobody below 1900 should consider Carlsen's and Anand's double omission as a real blunder) - what comes to mind is Kramnik blundering a mate in one to a computer, and Nigel Short in a winning position, finding the only move on the board that loses - simply walking his king up the board, into - you guessed it - a mate in one!
Me too
