Classic "book" checkmate

Sort:
Fromper

In studying tactics, I'm going through Murray Chandler's "How to Beat Your Dad at Chess" for about the 15th time, just to make sure I can still recognize the patterns and calculate out the solutions several moves deep (some of which are 10 moves long). Don't let the silly title fool you - this is a GREAT book on typical attacking/mating patterns.

 

Anyway, I came across this relatively easy puzzle in that book, and I know the solution to it, but I was trying to make sure it works against every possible defense. I came up with a defense that the author doesn't mention. It's a better defense for black, but I'm pretty sure it still allows white to mate in a couple more moves. See what you think:

 --Fromper


demuxer
thats easy, is hard to keep your bishop at f4 with that free diagonal
Ridzwan

WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

THIS IS MY FIRST TIME LOOKING FOR A EASY PUZZLE WITH A CHECKMATE!

THANKS A LOT 

GreenLaser
1.Qa6 Nb6 2.Qxa7 Nfd7 3.Ba6 is Fromper's line. Now 3...Nc5 prevents mate but 4.dxc5 bxa6 5.Qb8+ Kd7 6.Qxb6 Qxc5 7.Ne5+ Ke8 8.Qxc6+ wins. 3.Ba6 was right and better than Na4, a4, or Ne5. Sometimes writers omit weak lines, even if they do not lose as badly as what they show.
Jaguarphd

Easy...two move mate

QE2xA6

PB7xA6 

BF1xA6

 

This is my first time writing algebric notation so if I messed up...correct me 


silentfilmstar13
Jaguarphd wrote:

Easy...two move mate

QE2xA6 

PB7xA6 

BF1xA6

 

This is my first time writing algebric notation so if I messed up...correct me 


You must not use capital letters for the names of the squares.  Those are reserved for the pieces.  Also, instead of using "P" to define a pawn, don't use anything.  The lack of a piece definer indicates that it is a pawn.  Only use "x" to note a capture.  You should number the moves, as well.  Here is what your notation should look like:

1.Qa6  bxa6

2.Bxa6#

Note: You may use either "#" or "++" to indicate checkmate.

silentfilmstar13
Soulcrates wrote: GreenLaser wrote: 1.Qa6 Nb6 2.Qxa7 Nfd7 3.Ba6 is Fromper's line. Now 3...Nc5 prevents mate but 4.dxc5 bxa6 5.Qb8+ Kd7 6.Qxb6 Qxc5 7.Ne5+ Ke8 8.Qxc6+ wins. 3.Ba6 was right and better than Na4, a4, or Ne5. Sometimes writers omit weak lines, even if they do not lose as badly as what they show.

 I'd like to see that in a puzzle.  Sounds very informative, but I'm really not good at following letters.  I'm more of a visual learner.


Put it in a puzzle, then.

SurroundSoundDad
silentfilmstar13 wrote:
Jaguarphd wrote:

Easy...two move mate

QE2xA6

PB7xA6

BF1xA6

This is my first time writing algebric notation so if I messed up...correct me


You must not use capital letters for the names of the squares. Those are reserved for the pieces. Also, instead of using "P" to define a pawn, don't use anything. The lack of a piece definer indicates that it is a pawn. Only use "x" to note a capture. You should number the moves, as well. Here is what your notation should look like:

1.Qa6 bxa6

2.Bxa6#

Note: You may use either "#" or "++" to indicate checkmate.

You cannot use ++ to mean checkmate in recent times it means double check. The significance is mostly so you know that the king is forced to move.

Arisktotle

Good intro to Boden's mate!