How is this a 4000 elo puzzle?

Sort:
Avatar of xn-1-1-1

https://www.chess.com/puzzles/problem/2560358

Ts is not 4000 elo πŸ™πŸ™πŸ˜­πŸ˜­

Call me Magnesium Carlsberg or Hikiru Nakamara the way I solved that puzzle.

But in all seriousness, is this some advanced trolling or did the difficulty loop on itself or somethin?

Avatar of LieutenantFrankColumbo

A puzzles rating is completely useless in terms of improving.

Avatar of xn-1-1-1

ok

Avatar of MRQUGMO

some puzzle ratings are glitched for some topics like back rank and mate in 1 or 2 etc

Avatar of JosephReidNZ

Welcome to my world

Avatar of Tidalwave11111

lol fr tho its so easy

Avatar of Fet
What?!
Avatar of Alireza_br0

 :draw

Avatar of KingNilx
xn-1-1-1 skrev:

https://www.chess.com/puzzles/problem/2560358

Ts is not 4000 elo πŸ™πŸ™πŸ˜­πŸ˜­

Call me Magnesium Carlsberg or Hikiru Nakamara the way I solved that puzzle.

But in all seriousness, is this some advanced trolling or did the difficulty loop on itself or somethin?

SOOOOOO ez

Avatar of Troxy474

where is the puzzle

Avatar of Avandhar

This must be a mistake. This is more like 400 rated puzzle than 4000 rated. Essentially only one move that you could even consider and it is the right one :-)

Avatar of Avandhar
LieutenantFrankColumbo wrote:

A puzzles rating is completely useless in terms of improving.

Complete useless is kind of strong statement. There is moderate correlation between puzzle rating and chess.com rating, which at least strongly indicates doing one is likely to improve the other. So higher puzzle rating implies better tactical ability, but how well that translates to in-game performance is highly variable, but improving in puzzles is likely to improve your game as well at least to a point.