Rating Gestures

Sort:
Avatar of Iopquv

In playing my first game on Chess.com, I received a rating of 1200, before I played. Why, and how was that arrived at?

 

 

PLEASE COMMENT!

Avatar of Iopquv

but why?

Avatar of kunduk

chess.com does'nt know how good are you in chess. so, 1200 is the starting value. if you win, you go higher, & otherwise, you lose points.

Avatar of Iopquv

still dont get it

Avatar of TadDude
teja2chess wrote:

In playing my first game on Chess.com, I received a rating of 1200, before I played. Why, and how was that arrived at?


I have a feeling off déjà vu.

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/chess-rating-system

Avatar of ASpieboy

That's weird...

Avatar of nuclearturkey

If you don't have a starting rating how can it ever be calculated?

Avatar of Bur_Oak

That's weird...

ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha

Don't panic.

Avatar of wingtzun

1200 rating is a kind of average 'good when i was at school' type player. It is a base to work from.

If you have evidence of a higher rating (e.g Fide title, USCF, BCF) you can submit evidence to chess.com and they will give you an appropriate starting rating.

Avatar of nuclearturkey
mkirk wrote:

1200 rating is a kind of average 'good when i was at school' type player. It is a base to work from.

If you have evidence of a higher rating (e.g Fide title, USCF, BCF) you can submit evidence to chess.com and they will give you an appropriate starting rating.


No they won't.

Avatar of wingtzun

Ok nuclearturkey, if you wish to think this.  amazing how all the titled players (fide title) who have never played a game on here, have a rating of 2200+  (e.g GM Raymond Keene) - why? - because they submitted evidence of previous grade/title.

Avatar of wingtzun

Ok, I am wrong.

Avatar of nuclearturkey
mkirk wrote:

Ok nuclearturkey, if you wish to think this.  amazing how all the titled players (fide title) who have never played a game on here, have a rating of 2200+  (e.g GM Raymond Keene) - why? - because they submitted evidence of previous grade/title.


I'm not falling for your trolling/slash stupidity to lure me in this time. It is a fact that I stated for the benefit of the OP.

Avatar of nuclearturkey
mkirk wrote:

Ok, I am wrong.


Oh, well this time maybe you were not trolling..

Edit: Actually you've done this whole "I'm right, no I'm wrong, no I'm right" thing before, you probably are..

Avatar of wingtzun

Yes, i checked and i was actually wrong. Everybody starts at 1200.

Avatar of wingtzun

if i am 'wrong' i admit it and try to put it right. when some other people are wrong, well........................................Cry

Avatar of wingtzun

Yes, as i said i was wrong. I was thinking of another chess site (chesscube, i think).

Avatar of TadDude

Titled players, who submit documentation, do not start at 1200.

See post#3: erik wrote "See we manually adjusted her rating to 2200 - she's a WGM. :)"

Unfortunately the documents submitted were later rejected.

See post #28: erik wrote "we got an application for a new WGM. i looked at the documents and they looked suspicious, so i started to investigate more."

Finally see GM Nigel Davies. Rated 2200 at chess.com with zero games played.

Avatar of wingtzun

Ok, so maybe I was correct.!!

Avatar of nuclearturkey
mkirk wrote:

Ok, so maybe I was correct.!!


Yes, this time you were and I was wrong. So, I apologize to you for that. 

Avatar of Guest5826209445
Please Sign Up to comment.

If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.