Shortest-proof-game challenge

Sort:
Arisktotle
Leither123 wrote:

(Interestingly, due to the way I created the positions, the move length is hidden in the FEN! Has anyone noticed this before?)

Yes, I did! A bit late or I would have aborted my attempts to find an SPG in 6.5 earlier! FENs don't count in serious compositions - not the number of moves, not the proximity of the 50-move line, not the side on move, not the castling rights or anything else in the FEN.

ONLY THE DIAGRAM + the text of the challenge (stipulation).

If I understand you well this one has one intended solution in 10.0 moves. Or is it two? Tomorrow I'll look!

Leither123

Unfortunately, I have now discovered multiple solutions to the position. But the shortest amount of moves is still 10.0, hopefully.

BishopTakesH7
Leither123 wrote:

Unfortunately, I have now discovered multiple solutions to the position. But the shortest amount of moves is still 10.0, hopefully.

If you ever want a cursory check at your positions, Jacobi has a proof game website where you don’t even have to download an engine.

Arisktotle
BishopTakesH7 wrote:

If you ever want a cursory check at your positions, Jacobi has a proof game website where you don’t even have to download an engine.

Thx! Didn't know that. I'll check it out!

Leither123

Sounds useful! Is this the website?

https://wismuth.com/jacobi/latest/solver.html

n9531l1
Leither123 wrote:

Well, worry no more, as I will now present a position with an intended length.

I intend for this to have PGs in 10.0, and I have my own solution ready (though I feel there are more solutions). To be honest, I didn't bother checking thoroughly to see if it's possible to get below ten, so feel free to try getting there

(Interestingly, due to the way I created the positions, the move length is hidden in the FEN! Has anyone noticed this before?)

For this position, Stelvio finds there are many solution in 10.0, none in 9.5, many in 9.0, none in 8.5, and none in 8.0.

BishopTakesH7
Leither123 wrote:

Sounds useful! Is this the website?

https://wismuth.com/jacobi/latest/solver.html

Should be.

tygxc

@5964

Arisktotle
tygxc wrote:

@5964

You cheated wink The knight on b1 should have been captured.

tygxc

@5973

n9531l1

Here's one of the many solutions to #5964 in 9.0.

n9531l1
EndgameEnthusiast2357 wrote:

Who authorized this weird change of the challenge?

You did. Don't you remember?

RewanDemontay

The evolution was nigh.

EndgameEnthusiast2357

No I didn't lol, I just said the proof games should always end in black making the last move so that it's a full number of moves.

n9531l1
EndgameEnthusiast2357 wrote:

No I didn't lol, I just said the proof games should always end in black making the last move so that it's a full number of moves.

But if that became a requirement, it would be a very weird change.

n9531l1

To be more accurate, there is a person who wants full moves.

(Posted in response to EndgameEnthusiast's deleted comment that "people want full moves".)

EvinSung
n9531l1
EvinSung wrote:
#5984

Here's one of several solutions in 9.5.

Ilampozhil25

Rg1 is just included to spite endgame enthusiast, yes?

BishopTakesH7

I find Endgame's logic funny since the following are apparently against the rules:

  • Any games that end with black resigning.
  • Any endgame studies that end with a white move (most studies.)
  • Any game where white checkmates black.