I'll wait to spend more time on it until you try the one I linked at #6223.
i remember it but not which post
What?? When you click on the link you'll see the post.
I'll wait to spend more time on it until you try the one I linked at #6223.
i remember it but not which post
What?? When you click on the link you'll see the post.
I'll wait to spend more time on it until you try the one I linked at #6223.
i remember it but not which post
What?? When you click on the link you'll see the post.
i mean a previous post
What?? When you click on the link you'll see the post.
i mean a previous post
Since you don't seem to be able to follow the link, I'll post it again. Please give a proof game for the position below. Leither may still be working on it.
Good proof of legality in 94.0. See if you can shorten it to 74.0 or less.
@6238
"most likely the SPG" ++ I doubt that
"Excellent work" ++ sure
I should say "possibly the SPG" in anticipation of a shortening from tygxc.
Proof game in 21.0. EvinSung will tell us how much shorter it needs to be.
4 moves shorter
Proof game in 13.0. EvingSung will tell us how much shorter it needs to be.
do not know
@6227