well i think they're different in the way that all the squares around the black king are attacked multiple times
Shortest-proof-game challenge
#815
I think this is illegal. What is white's last move? What is black's last move? There is a problem.

#815
I found a way to almost reach this position, but one queen is at c3 instead of d3
#815 is clearly illegal, since the black king is unattacked, but every square in its field is attacked at least three times. In your final position, the black king is unattacked, but there is one square in its field (d8) that is attacked only twice, meaning White has a retraction that leaves the king attacked only once and a second retraction that gives the king two adjacent unattacked squares. The king has to have legal squares to move to while the queens take their places.

#827
half a move shorter:
Don't stop there. Or, do stop there, and post your first proof game for #806.

#815
I found a way to almost reach this position, but one queen is at c3 instead of d3
#815 is clearly illegal, since the black king is unattacked, but every square in its field is attacked at least three times.
I take back what I said before about the position being illegal. Here's the position with the queen on c3 and Black to move, proven legal, except that White has let Black keep a rook.
So it was legal all along in the original position.
whoops
do it then