@chessaddictress: I completely agree. We have to actually begin the puzzle before giving up... Your idea could possibly work! What's say I start from one end, you start from the other and AndyClifton starts in the middle... that's a great idea, chessaddictress. Once we all meet at a certain spot, we should have it nearly completed? Although, I have to say that this is like pi. 3.1415... It just seems to go on forever!
The Hardest Puzzle.


I just saw that I spelled "lettuce" as "lettus" in my previous comment. No wonder I'm having problems with this puzzle.
@AndyClifton: OK, great!
@Heinzie: Do you want to join us? If we get more people, each person could get one of the 8 queens on the 4th rank, and we could either begin, or just sit around and talk about beginning or not beginning.

Speaking of chomping, I have to go eat something before I pass out. (See, I'm delaying the beginning of work again!)

Amazingly, Houdini 3.0 indicates only 1. Qcxb5! leads to a decent advantage, rating this position at just +3.14
Seriously? Even Deep Rybka 4 crashes in this position.

Assuming we take Houdini's word for it - well then, the question then is: after Qcxb5, then what? One can quickly see the expotential increase in variables as the moves continue, can't one? That is one reason not to begin the puzzle, as I see it.

I completely agree. If the computer refuses to solve it, why should we? Or are we just doing this in order to delay the process, again?
Good question, CalbaMan! You see, not only is the answer to this puzzle a secret, but the new rules of chess in their entirety are secret as well, and they will only be revealed at the moment someone solves this puzzle!
Quantum chess!
@heinzie: Oh, I can beat computers. Don't take no stock in 'em.