The Hardest Puzzle.

Sort:
chessaddictress

@heinzie:  Oh, I can beat computers.  Don't take no stock in 'em.

CalbaMan

@chessaddictress: I completely agree. We have to actually begin the puzzle before giving up...Undecided Your idea could possibly work! What's say I start from one end, you start from the other and AndyClifton starts in the middle... that's a great idea, chessaddictress. Once we all meet at a certain spot, we should have it nearly completed? Although, I have to say that this is like pi. 3.1415... It just seems to go on forever!

AndyClifton

OK this is good Ms. tress, I am lettuce grower so that is OK!!

chessaddictress

@heinzie:  And the Houdini accepted the position?

chessaddictress

I just saw that I spelled "lettuce" as "lettus" in my previous comment.  No wonder I'm having problems with this puzzle.

 

@AndyClifton:  OK, great! 

 

@Heinzie:  Do you want to join us?  If we get more people, each person could get one of the 8 queens on the 4th rank, and we could either begin, or just sit around and talk about beginning or not beginning.

chessaddictress

AndyClifton is a lettuce grower!!!  Maybe he should be the team leader.

CalbaMan

Maybe he should! I believe I have more charisma though.

chessaddictress

That's fine with me.  Charisma helps me to chomp.

CalbaMan

@chessaddictress: Great. Me too.

chessaddictress

Speaking of chomping, I have to go eat something before I pass out.  (See, I'm delaying the beginning of work again!)

CalbaMan

All right, see you then... Maybe you should go ask Andy for some lettuce?

ChessisGood
heinzie wrote:

Amazingly, Houdini 3.0 indicates only 1. Qcxb5! leads to a decent advantage, rating this position at just +3.14


Seriously? Even Deep Rybka 4 crashes in this position.

chessaddictress

Assuming we take Houdini's word for it - well then, the question then is:  after Qcxb5, then what?  One can quickly see the expotential increase in variables as the moves continue, can't one?  That is one reason not to begin the puzzle, as I see it.

CalbaMan

I completely agree. If the computer refuses to solve it, why should we? Or are we just doing this in order to delay the process, again?

k90762289487
chessaddictress wrote:

Good question, CalbaMan!  You see, not only is the answer to this puzzle a secret, but the new rules of chess in their entirety are secret as well, and they will only be revealed at the moment someone solves this puzzle!


 Quantum chess!

chessaddictress

@k90762289487:  Yep, that's it.  Quantum chess!  [What does quantum mean again?]

chessaddictress

@CalbaMan:  Correct.  We're doing this in order to delay the process...again.

CalbaMan
chessaddictress wrote:

@k90762289487:  Yep, that's it.  Quantum chess!  [What does quantum mean again?]


@chessaddictress: Quantum means... it's time for you to get a dictionary! Sorry, bad joke. Quantum means:

CalbaMan

Huh. My definition didn't show up.

chessaddictress

Maybe it's a visual definition - an invisible visual definition.  Quantum particles being so tiny you can't see them?