White to play and gain a winning advantage

I have defeated several 1900's on Chesscube without much trouble.

lol...I've beaten 2200s fairly easily on chesscube...the rating system there is as inflated as a hot air balloon... (EDIT : and you for that matter...)

I'm 2600 on chesscube. 1900 = 1400 rating.

+1

ChessCube has better competition overall, but I like the forums here.

@YourASlob is at it again.  He communes with Houdini, and sows mayhem throughout the forums.  No surprise there.   

I get to play against the top guys a lot of both sites quite a bit and I find chess.com has the stronger players for the mostpart, but anyway 

1.Nf7 first should also get an advantage, with the line 1...bxc5 2.Nxg6 Rg8 3.Nfxe5+ with the idea of pushing the f-pawn next. In fact after Kd6 f7 he'd probably have to play Be6 or something and give up the rook, leaving him 2 pawns down.

Yep.

A 1300 jerk vs. 1930 and one heck of a lot of other pretty good players.

Who will win?

+1

Beat a 2400 in 10 sec once... ez.

Impressive, you should stick to bullet chess, less thinking required

Chess results are not related to skill according to Yereslov.

It´s just that those players with higher ratings are lucky and that there are other "mental factors" that affect his results.

I saw in another thread a player with 959 blitz rating here, but he is 1500 in chesscube.

At least he's not arguing about being better than a master anymore.

OK, now that this is a serious challenge (I will give you the refutation) I will ask you to do just that.

In your post #8, you stopped a line in the middle of a forcing variation (A check even!): in calculation, we never do that if we can avoid it.

I don't see a win at all for white after 35.Rxh7+. I certainly wouldn't resign against any level of player in this position.

So please continue this variation. Let's say black plays not 35...Kc8? Now keep going. How is this winning at all for white?

Here's the catch. I want to know exactly how you find each move in the variation in plain english, and I want to know exactly why white is better and by approximately how much. I want you to do what you said you would: "I will give you the refutation".-Yaro, not Houdini (cause he can't talk). No numbers and each move needs to be explained unless it's blatantly obvious or forced or something from the perspective of a 1200, player, not a 3000+ machine.

This is a totally serious request, because in all honesty I see (maybe you see different) that white is better for a reason (you tell me yours though) but I would keep playing on. I'm a resign mongrel, so that's saying something.

Not here to insult you (although you so deserve it!!), as this is a real challenge.

Also, you asked for a good game from pfren? -----------

Just look at his "best win" on corr chess. A Danish Gambit thematic. Pfren skillfully reduces his opponent's activity and remains a pawn up, later winning the game. Much better than any game you've played for sure, and all that you've posted so far.

BTW. I almost thought the "rook sac" was something really special, but it turns out it was a simple tactic forcing checkmate for vast wins of material; how is that a sacrifice if you win the king in 2 or 3 moves?!

For a REAL piece sacrifice, my world open game that I posted is a perfect example.

One final thing. I bet you are going to say than pfren's game was nothing.

In that case, YOU give some variations and explanations as well as improvements to his play. No numbers of course, no long lines, no houdini nor any other chess engines. Just tell us improvements that you could have found and why they are better etc... in English of course... or Chinese (if you know it).

good luck getting a decent response from yerslov, crtexxx. 

His ability to squiggle out of being held to answer for his numb comments while being tied down to a lame rating is way beyond the skills of a mere Houdini!

Is both really.

There is nothing wrong with the puzzle, so I don't get the comments. No one has posted a refutation, so I can only assume the responders are trolls.