please delete this thread

Sort:
festers-siesta

The earth's temperature has been stable for more than 8000 years. The current rise in temperature exceeds and spikes since that time and are documented to have begun roughly 150 years ago at the start of the industrialization of the majority of the western world, including America, Europe and parts of Asia and thereby indicate human cause.

festers-siesta
BunWithGun6392 wrote:
Billy-bingo wrote:

My sources are a few hundred years of scientific and geologic studies.

Again:

[insert image here]

why is ur volume so highhhh

I cannot control the size of text on photos copied here.

BunWithGun6392
Billy-bingo wrote:
BunWithGun6392 wrote:
Billy-bingo wrote:

My sources are a few hundred years of scientific and geologic studies.

Again:

[insert image here]

why is ur volume so highhhh

I cannot control the size of text on photos copied here.

uh. ok?

festers-siesta
theeldest1 wrote:

Just to cite one specific example, there are fossilized trees in the Grand Canyon that stick straight up through many different layers of rock. According to mainstream 'science', those layers were gradually laid down over millions of years, so how come a single tree can stay there for millions of years while rock builds up around it? Now a global flood would have laid down dozens of feet of rock in an instant, easily explaining and providing a mechanism to fossilize those trees.

Fossilized trees occured over hundreds of thousands of years. That some were buried in verticle positions does not indicate they were alive for that span of time.

festers-siesta
theeldest1 wrote:

True, humans have definitely contributed to a slight rise in temperature since the Industrial Period, very little doubt about that! The consequences though are open to debate..

A rise of 1.5 degree Celsius is enough to melt glaciers, which is now ongoing, raise ocean temperatures causing expansion flooding, currently happening, and salinity changes effecting ocean biology and fish stock, currently in decline.

There is no debate. The only open debate is how long before is gets worse and can we stop it in time.

festers-siesta
theeldest1 wrote:

But a tree would surely decay in that amount of time? And they couldn't have been fossilized before they were buried because fossilization doesn't work that way.

You admited to fossilization being possible.Are you aware how it works?

Sudden burial in rock would not fossilize wood. It would simply crush it. Fossilization requires the slow replacement of wood cells with minerals from the surrounding mud. It is not instantaneous.

festers-siesta

I do not want to turn this thread into a debate. I just want your position on climate change as I asked in the opening comment.

festers-siesta

Just pick a number. It ain't rocket science.

You are an obvious 3.

Actually_Forgot_My_Name

I'd say I'm number 2. I'd love to do something, but what am I supposed to do about it?

festers-siesta

You deny there is a climate problem.

You are a 3.

BasixWhiteBoy

I would say that I’m in group 4.

festers-siesta
Actually_Forgot_My_Name wrote:

I'd say I'm number 2. I'd love to do something, but what am I supposed to do about it?

Good honest answer. I feel you.

festers-siesta
BasixWhiteBoy wrote:

I would say that I’m in group 4.

That's disappointing. I credited you with higher intelligence and social awareness.

festers-siesta
theeldest1 wrote:

Okay, fine. Put me in whatever group makes you happy. I'll take 3 or 4.

There's a major difference in denying or not caring.

BasixWhiteBoy
Billy-bingo wrote:
BasixWhiteBoy wrote:

I would say that I’m in group 4.

That's disappointing. I credited you with higher intelligence and social awareness.

Not being delusional and realizing that climate change is a problem puts me above a fair amount of people. Though, since I’m so young, I honestly don’t really care. I could say group number two, but I wanted to answer honestly instead of pretending.

Actually_Forgot_My_Name

I don't really understand the people who actively deny that climate change is real. It's obvious that we humans have had some impact on the atmosphere. Or maybe they are actually afraid of climate change, and are trying to cope by denying that it exists?

theeldest1

Nah, I'm not denying that the climate is changing. But it's a tiny difference in temperature and it's not going to be a huge problem, if a problem at all.

festers-siesta
BasixWhiteBoy wrote:
Billy-bingo wrote:
BasixWhiteBoy wrote:

I would say that I’m in group 4.

That's disappointing. I credited you with higher intelligence and social awareness.

Not being delusional and realizing that climate change is a problem puts me above a fair amount of people. Though, since I’m so young, I honestly don’t really care. I could say group number two, but I wanted to answer honestly instead of pretending.

You a part of the generation likely to deal with the worst of it and you don't care?

theeldest1

I think you're taking this a bit too seriously, ay wot wot?

Actually_Forgot_My_Name
BasixWhiteBoy wrote:
Billy-bingo wrote:
BasixWhiteBoy wrote:

I would say that I’m in group 4.

That's disappointing. I credited you with higher intelligence and social awareness.

Not being delusional and realizing that climate change is a problem puts me above a fair amount of people. Though, since I’m so young, I honestly don’t really care. I could say group number two, but I wanted to answer honestly instead of pretending.

Besides, I'm only 15 years old, what exactly am I supposed to do about a France-sized trash blob in the middle of the Pacific Ocean?