please delete this thread
Your knowledge of EVs and the cost of renewables needs work.
This is an excellent point proving even creationists can't agree.
No more religious comments period.
Make one and I will have to block you to save the thread from being locked
No.
at the moment, i care not about climate change. i want to see the sky. the real sky.
Illogical?
For the third time I repeat I am interested in your position related to climate in the four categories I listed. Feel free to expand on your reasons but I am not inclined in this thread to engage with you.
There is another thread for that
I am a 2, sort of. Initial discussions about climate change envisioned a 3 prong approach: reduce greenhouse gas emissions, prepare for the inevitable climate changes in order to mitigate the impact, and finally to research climate engineering, which may be eventually required. Imo, we have over focussed on the first of these 3 prongs.
Interesting.
How do you envision preparing for the impact of, say, coastal flooding from increase in storm severity?
What are you referring to as climate engineering?
Interesting.
How do you envision preparing for the impact of, say, coastal flooding from increase in storm severity?
What are you referring to as climate engineering?
We could have, for example, stopped building in flood prone areas.
Climate engineering is not just one thing, potentially. We could, for example, put particulates in the upper atmosphere, which would decrease the solar load on the planet. We could attempt to mitigate solar load in a few other seemingly futuristic manners.
The point about climate engineering is to research better what might be possible, so I don't have great examples to provide.
NASA included all 3 prongs in their advisements until I believe 2019. Then they removed climate engineering from the list, saying it is too risky. That is possibly true, but scant research has been conducted, as far as I can tell, so to me it sounds a bit like contempt prior to investigation.
Interesting.
How do you envision preparing for the impact of, say, coastal flooding from increase in storm severity?
What are you referring to as climate engineering?
We could have, for example, stopped building in flood prone areas.
Climate engineering is not just one thing, potentially. We could, for example, put particulates in the upper atmosphere, which would decrease the solar load on the planet. We could attempt to mitigate solar load in a few other seemingly futuristic manners.
The point about climate engineering is to research better what might be possible, so I don't have great examples to provide.
NASA included all 3 prongs in their advisements until I believe 2019. Then they removed climate engineering from the lust, saying it is too risky. That is possibly true, but scant research has been conducted, as far as I can tell, so to me it sounds a bit like contempt prior to investigation.
okay thanks for that. I agree about coastal building but there is no one entity controlling that. There is activity in that arena such as eliminating building permits on beachfronts but only in small areas and seemingly only after disaster washes away structures.
In some places insurance costs have risen so high as to prohibit all but the most foolish to build.
I have seen nothing about climate engineering significant enough to follow.
There are plenty of conspiracy theories about it being done already.
Interesting.
How do you envision preparing for the impact of, say, coastal flooding from increase in storm severity?
What are you referring to as climate engineering?
Is this engaging?
Please read post #1.
Interesting.
How do you envision preparing for the impact of, say, coastal flooding from increase in storm severity?
What are you referring to as climate engineering?
Is this engaging?
Please read post #1.
Don't imagine you are the first to complain you can't post your religious views. The simple concept you can't grasp is that the creator of the thread does not make that rule. The site does. But there have been many threads locked by the site for allowing that discussion. It, therefore behooves the thread owner to stop it, by blocking if necessary.
Secondly, there have been creationists who intentionally cause threads to be locked because they don't agree with science, or whatever in the topic bothers them.
It is for this reason, according to you, I ignored you. The alternative was to block you, which I chose not to do.
However, since you have decided to take your grievance to a different thread indicates to me your opinion I am somehow to blame for singling you out. You did that to yourself. I gave you ample opportunity and even engaged for a few comments, but that didn't satisfy you.
Your attempt to continue your complaint elsewhere convinces me your intention is to proselytize there too.
With that in mind you are blocked from this and any thread I create.
If you continue your present vendetta elsewhere I will report you for trolling.
Apologies, I'll leave you alone
Obviously not.
You went on another thread and lied about me disrespecting you here. Have you put your morals away for another day or does your homeschooling teach lying as a method of getting your own way?
Please list the comments here where I disrespected your life choices, your religion and your character etc that you lied about.
I'm sure anyone here would like to see it.
would say i'm something between group 2 and group 4
okay. thanks