Well, I've read some books like that, well parts of them. They all show you some things you can't expain, present some far fetched theory then tell you those things are evidence of their theory. It's kind of boring. It's usually written in a boring style too.
I would like it if it where presented something like a Dan Brown novel. This way it's only exciting if you can get yourself to believe it and I've never managed to do that.
I would rather read.... Lord Of The Rings , 
the summary is real good at the end of that last book by Sitchen.Should one get the book read the Summary at the end saves a lot of time & also you will then know if you want to invest personal time & read the whole book.I mention that because it is mind blowing proof & only 2 pages
Oh no ,a non believer in our mist.. . Do some research on the Mayan Calender,the Hopi Indians etc. You don,t expect everything just handed to you or do you ?Read Zachari Sitchens last book ,if thats to much to ask then read the summary in his last book .Thats only a couple pages you should be able to handle that.
you re talking about the mayan long calender right?
we use the gregorian calender when it gets to Dec 31st you dont think the world will end do you? no you dont you know the calender will reset itself and start again (nasa scientist says this better in link i posted earlier)
mayan calender (i would presume) would do the same
soldierpiper wrote:
You don,t expect everything just handed to you or do you ?
The OP created this thread to explain to me his thoughts about annunaki... so yes i do 
Mithras doesn't need to read that stuff. He's a bloody wizard for cryin' out loud!
Mithras is an ancient Persian/Roman God , but Merlin apparently worshipped at Mithras' altar
Mithras main symbol is a image of him wrestling a bull
I can spot *bull* at a 100 paces
From what I've read, designs and construction methods of pyramids around the world varied widely. Egyptian pyramids were built by stacking stone blocks. Central and South American ones were built using retaining walls filled with rubble. Mounds in North America such as the Cahokia Mounds were just big piles of dirt. We are still building monuments today, only our construction methods have advanced to the point at which we don't need to have an enormous base to support the weight of a structure. Thus we no longer build pyramids, because of the waste of energy the large, unnecessary base is.
Generally, their is an obvious record showing that the builders were practicing, learning from their mistakes. For example, in Egypt, you see baby steps such as step pyramids (the step pyramid of Djoser is an example), with a sequence of gradually larger pyramids, followed by obvious mistakes such as the bent pyramid. Central and South American pyramids were also rebuilt time and time again, often on the same site with the rubble from the old building used as fill for the new one. The structures got progressively larger with each re-building. In each situation we see progress from rudimentary beginnings to more grand achievements, a natural progression.
Mithras wrote I can spot a bull at a 100 paces .... well I hate to brag but.. I can shoot the nuts off a flea at a thousand yards
Mithras wrote I can spot a bull at a 100 paces .... well I hate to brag but.. I can shoot the nuts off a flea at a thousand yards
must be a small bullet.
Ever see a Flea die ....... it aint easy
Poor bull. Learning is fun! Thanks, Mithras.
From what I've read, designs and construction methods of pyramids around the world varied widely. Egyptian pyramids were built by stacking stone blocks. Central and South American ones were built using retaining walls filled with rubble. Mounds in North America such as the Cahokia Mounds were just big piles of dirt. We are still building monuments today, only our construction methods have advanced to the point at which we don't need to have an enormous base to support the weight of a structure. Thus we no longer build pyramids, because of the waste of energy the large, unnecessary base is.
Generally, their is an obvious record showing that the builders were practicing, learning from their mistakes. For example, in Egypt, you see baby steps such as step pyramids (the step pyramid of Djoser is an example), with a sequence of gradually larger pyramids, followed by obvious mistakes such as the bent pyramid. Central and South American pyramids were also rebuilt time and time again, often on the same site with the rubble from the old building used as fill for the new one. The structures got progressively larger with each re-building. In each situation we see progress from rudimentary beginnings to more grand achievements, a natural progression.
I can answer this fully, but just briefly here, all pyramids were emulations of the great pyramid of giza which was built by the anunnaki, and which was a "perfect pyramid" which still stands, clearly.
All pyramids thereafter resulted in failure, and as you can see from the bent pyramid, it was heading the same way as the inclination was too steep for the builders of the time and had to be altered halfway through to avert a complete disaster.
It was mentioned earlier about some of the stones used in the pyramids however i would divert your attention to baalbeck in lebanon, xome of the stones there weigh in excess of 1000 tons and certainly cannot be moved today, in particular the stone of the pregnant woman which was only half quarried and still stands there.
Baalbeck was actually built as a launching/landing site for the craft of the anunnaki which was known throughout ancient history and is why it was rebuilt on again and again, including the by the romans who built the largest structure they ever built there in an out of the way province.
I am currently on holiday at the moment and cant get on line for long each day but when i get home in a few days i will present many undisputable facts for anybody who is still unconvinced that what i have presented here from the first post is fact.
Thats right ,its amazing stuff for sure.
I can answer this fully, but just briefly here, all pyramids were emulations of the great pyramid of giza which was built by the anunnaki, and which was a "perfect pyramid" which still stands, clearly.
All pyramids thereafter resulted in failure, and as you can see from the bent pyramid, it was heading the same way as the inclination was too steep for the builders of the time and had to be altered halfway through to avert a complete disaster.
don't you have to rewrite a bit of history to get to this conclusion, since the great pyramid was not the first one built?
Wait until he returns ,to answer these deep questions
Well you asked for evidence so its out if you care to read it .Russell lol !!!