nothing to see here

ha, perhaps.  i hadn't had any coffee

Mayans= Mexico and Central America, not S. America

They had big cats in their jungles and to this day call the large, cougar-like one leon, or lion.

You shouldn't be calling someone a blithering idiot when you continue to make obvious errors like these.

whats this?

post 162 - the death star looked so much bigger in the movie. 

perhaps it is because i'm in the states, but i thought blithering idiot was really pretty funny. 

i had wondered about the jaguar = leo reference, especially since leo is obviously a translation (latin?), but didn't care to look it up. 

to be fair, that aside, the similarities between beliefs far distant is pretty striking.  i don't even think it is outside the realm of possibility that aliens did play some part, although this is not my personal theory.  but, once you get into the aliens using people as slaves to mine gold, or monoatomic gold, and 12th planents that only the summarians and alien astrontists seem to know about; things go off the rails for me.  too much of that just defies logic, and is seriously lacking in credible proof. 

Thamks for the first relevant comment in a while jester. I have also seen the unearthing of human? footprints unearthed in shale right next to dinosaur prints. Reportedly the annunaki first around 500,000 years ago, could it have been even before that? I dont need to say that humans definately were not around in that period.

Thganks again jester i was even unaware of a couple of those comments, The evidence mounts.

When i say south americans i am includin bolivia  , mexico, peru etc as i am talking broadly about the mayans, incans, toltecs, olmecs etc. As for your cats i might as well start calling my tabby a lion. They are a completely different species to the lion found in the zodiac which is what was represented by these people. Also you missed the point which was how did people in central america if you will have knowledge of the sumerian zodiac? It wasnt just leo but every other sign was virtually identical.

Really?

Prove it.

Enough blah blah blah.

Thanks kneejo, gilgamesh was a sumerian king who went in search for everlasting life which he felt was his right being semi divine, his search led him to tilmun, land of the rocketships, a city of the anunnaki. Learn more in post 101 anyone who has not come across this. Following up on leo in mexico, there are also depictions of gilgamesh there battling two lions. Not pumas, Not cougars, Lions.

Goldendog, the sumerians were just the first to point out the existence of nibiru as they were the first to do so many things. I will try to find a picture of their depiction of the solar system which included nibiru and its orbit. Ra in egypt, Marduk in babylon were identified by a winged disc which is the symbol for nibiru. The first pharoahs of egypt were hybrids and this bloodline survives today.

Bex1p, doesn't seem to be able to tell the difference between goldendog and planeden. He can't figure out who wrote the comments he's commenting on, quite often. And now we have hybrid bloodlines. He's like a really confused David Icke fan. This is kind of a tragic comedy going on. Best and worst thread ever!

I speak to the person i quoted, to be honest it makes no difference who wrote it when there will alwats be a fool to fall short of the point by a long way. That is definately TRYSTS just check that, yes trysts is the fool. glad we civered that.I dont recall you actually making one worthwhile post as of yet. You were the person at school nobody would talk to arent you? Bet you dont even play chess, just intrude with an air of irrelevance.

Who can tell the difference?

Since I know you have a real problem with organizing your "thinking", let me point out that from page one of this thread, I was interested in your claims, and asked questions. This was done until it became quite clear to me that your proclamations were unoriginal, unsupported, and basically something a child would believe if they had not developed some kind of dicipline in investigating, and studying a subject.

The abundance of errors, and arrogance of the "enlightenment" you profess to "share" with us, can best be summed up in your response to 'your truth' being merely speculation. You responded that it's not speculation, it is a fact.

Best for you to have started and continued this thread with no claims of knowledge about the many mysterious discoveries of the past, but rather a free-flowing discussion of what you believe about them. Because, even though you struggle with a clear understanding of what you read, and what you're saying, it's not beyond imagination that that can be learned

I have barely started, and if it wasnt fopr the many pointless posts we may be further than we are now althjough i know there are many people who are interested in what i have to say and understand it also, I have made many points so far and provided you with directions to look in. I admit i get a little frustrated when people are plainly attempting to be unhelpful, Most of what i have said i state as fact because i know it to be the case, as for what is original you claim that it is just speculation so with you i cannot win. Im only 28 and do not have the wealth of experience that scholars such as sitchin have on these matters although i am able to see the bigger picture. There is a lot of info on these matters and im sure that we will get through the majority of it as i am aware that people are genuinely interested, and as time goes on others will be too. My intention for this thread was to point one person in the right direction, mithras to be precise, i didnt think it would draw the attention it has, but as that is the case i would prefer people to maybe just ask questions and i will try to answer them if i am able, also I am aware that some of you might have information that i can learn from. such as jesters posts earlier, some of the facts are undisputable and that is why i call them facts. For me what we are talking about here has implications all the way to modern day but we are not even close to making all of those connections yet. I recommend that you watch the video that i have posted a link for, just something i found yesterday, but makes some nice points.

This may not be the best venue for what you're trying to do which seems to be formulating your arguments. There's every possibility that we've been visited by aliens. You need to present a better case.

+1

One thing id say bex is that these members who have posted are, generally, an enlightened bunch, flaming only fuels the fire.

your stated facts are merely theories/interpretations, i wouldnt expect  these guys/gals to sit back and nod at everything you say.

Even Sitchin doesn't state his theories as "fact". No self-respecting scholar would, just like no self-respecting scientist would go beyond calling evolution a "theory". These are hypothesis' that direct their studies. They collate the actual facts into a workable direction of study. This is one of the reasons why scientists and scholars avoid the Alien Interaction Theory. They don't have physical evidence, and no first-hand eye-witness accounts. All they have for those periods are fragmented writings/signs from a dead society. And even a method of translating those signs are fragmented, unreliable, and vague.

So, every time you vomit what you "know" about the mysterious relics and structures of that period, you sound hysterically like a televangelist.