stop it, pleeeeeze!!
Are Guns Evil?
Sort:
Feufollet
Mar 3, 2015
0
#81
Yup, keep laughing kid. Someday maybe you'll understand things better. Right now, I'm chuckling, because you are a funny fellow. Sad, but funny. 
...and now the child resorts to his natural instinct... laughing at that which he is not yet capable of understanding. God help us, he's our future... *shaking my head* G'night kiddo. Don't let the bed bugs bite.
Yup, sweet dreams! Welcome to Tuesday!
About time. I blocked you long ago, when you ripped off that thread because your life is so very boring that you had nothing better to do.
Now let's see if you can ever learn to be creative and original. Then perhaps your life will be less boring. 
No, I didn't say that. I said the OP was long gone. It was, and has been, a 1st page game since I started coming to the forums back in 2013.
And more popular? Check the stats buddy... You have 612 posts. Mine has 2,084. Which is more popular? Or are you one of those "Common Core" math prodegies?
Suravira wrote:
Wilkes1949 escribió:
Suravira, and all you others that think guns are evil, keep on thinking that
Sorry, or you didn't understand me or i wasn't clear. I never said guns are evil. I said guns are tools, and are very dangerous. And i think civilians shouldn't be able to have guns. Countries where weapons are rare are safer where countries where guns are common, that is a fact.
If it would be up to me, the possesion of guns should be like a black belt, train hard for a few years, mind and body, learn auto control, pass a lot of tests, and then you can have your gun. But on the contrary, any random Joe can have his gun with minimun effort.
During those "few years" while I am training to be a black belt will they teach me how to dodge bullets? During those "few years" how many home invasions by ARMED criminals will there be? Also, can you tell me how many armed robberies have ever been stopped by a black belt? The black belt argument is a nieve answer to a very real problem and that is that criminals don't bring a black belt to a gun fight. I was military for twenty years and have experience with a variety of weapons and have extensive training in the martial arts. So would I go into a situation unarmed when the other person has a gun? Only a fool would do that. The only part of your statement that made sense is that people should be trained on the proper use of guns and gun safety.
Mar 3, 2015
0
#91
when did I say anti-american comments? I dont have anything against anyone of any land. The fact is just if guns wouldnt exist or wouldnt be availible for "normal" people then our world would undoubtedly be a better one. Its very fascinating how people always try to fight terror with terror instead of trying to prevent it fully.
Till_98 wrote:
The fact is just if guns wouldnt exist or wouldnt be availible for "normal" people then our world would undoubtedly be a better one.
I'm thinking we let the "normal" people keep their guns and take them away from the "criminal" people.
Regards,
Lou
Mar 3, 2015
0
#93
Hi Lou. My normal people also included criminals, although they arent "normal in this sense". And what use do guns have then if not for defense purpose?
Mar 3, 2015
0
#94
NomadicKnight wrote:
Feufollet wrote:
I never said anything about the 2nd Amendment or taking guns away from people.
You hitched you tricycle to the anti-gun crowd.
Yes. I did.
I believe Evil is a thing proper to man. And guns is one of the manifestations. Lost souls will hug it, worship it, worship the wrong Gods (that is, projecting their own ideas and imagination on God), slipping on the WRONG/EVIL "solutions" to solve problems like a woman slipping on her favourite dress...
Lost souls and stupidity are Evil's most effective servants.
Guns have no respect for life.
It kills - be that of an animal or a human being.
I'm personifying guns because even when in the hands of the innocents - children, toddlers - the Evil in it is activated.
For those comparing guns to cars and knives:
A toddler can't get in a car and run over people.
A toddler with knife in hand can't lunge at his parent and stab him in the heart.
Some people will starve to death when they run out of pizza pops to microwave.
good and evil exist, but only actions. An inanimate object can't be evil and a person either. Only an action, some people are capable of recognising evil and some aren't.
Till_98 wrote:
Hi Lou. My normal people also included criminals, although they arent "normal in this sense". And what use do guns have then if not for defense purpose?
Tough question.
1. Hunting.
2. The Olympic Biathlon.
3. Shotguns are useful for scaring off your 15-year-old daughter's Harley riding boyfriend.
4. .22s are good for shooting varmints infesting your garden. Better than chemicals. (Assuming a large garden in a rural stting.)
5. Putting down injured animals.
6. Because the bloody Founding Fathers made it expressly clear that we would always have the right to have bleedin' guns for various freakin' reasons, including, but not limited to: keeping the government at least a little in check. Power corrupts where you live too, I assume.
7. You never know when some psycho will go off his meds.
I don't know why this even merits discussion. More rights for private citizens are better than fewer rights (and yes, I'm aware this is a blanket statement). First, take the guns away from the criminals, then we can talk about taking them away from "normal" people. I won't agree to it, but at least the conversation might have some meaning.
Regards,
Lou
This evil thread is wickedly stupid.
Run with It...
Mar 3, 2015
0
#100
Litwitlou wrote:
Till_98 wrote:
Hi Lou. My normal people also included criminals, although they arent "normal in this sense". And what use do guns have then if not for defense purpose?
Tough question.
1. Hunting.
2. The Olympic Biathlon.
3. Shotguns are useful for scaring off your 15-year-old daughter's Harley riding boyfriend.
4. .22s are good for shooting varmints infesting your garden. Better than chemicals. (Assuming a large garden in a rural stting.)
5. Putting down injured animals.
6. Because the bloody Founding Fathers made it expressly clear that we would always have the right to have bleedin' guns for various freakin' reasons, including, but not limited to: keeping the government at least a little in check. Power corrupts where you live too, I assume.
7. You never know when some psycho will go off his meds.
I don't know why this even merits discussion. More rights for private citizens are better than fewer rights (and yes, I'm aware this is a blanket statement). First, take the guns away from the criminals, then we can talk about taking them away from "normal" people. I won't agree to it, but at least the conversation might have some meaning.
Regards,
Lou
Lol youhave to admit the reasons up from 2 are really far-fetched. Hunting is a serious reason but lets be honest, how many people go hunting??? Guns are made for killing, so I dont see a need in them. Just my opinion.