cheetos anyone?


Considering there’s multi millions of members here and Erik has such the task of pleasing AS BEST he knows he can it makes sense he has such refrained because how they are developed, brought up. There are as you I’m sure know groups that are such discussions, allowing those who like to express their understanding to others and helping each other, as well groups, that, were someone interested to find out more about what is truly for only their best interest, they certainly can. “,

I fully am for free speech, however, when it deals with something that tends to stir some up because being so controversial and against their belief standards it is wise a site respect his customers that have many times complained strongly due their beliefs regarding religion, and, as much as I would TRULY LOVE each and everyone here to realize the most importance in regards their best interest being respectful as to their viewpoint is the only proper Love we can give those to draw them closer to who they truly DO need, God.

I fully am for free speech, however, when it deals with something that tends to stir some up because being so controversial ...
I believe the outcome of free speech is worth the pain and controversy it may (or may not) cause. Ps...I have nothing against Cheetos . In fact I like them, and I support anyone on this site who may have a different snack preference.

Lol 😂
why going on about Cheetos? That isn’t your username that I thought was hilarious, squirrelgravy. 🤣
Cheetos are great, as are Doritos

I believe the outcome of free speech is worth the pain and controversy it may (or may not) cause.... etc.
“and, as much as I would TRULY LOVE each and everyone here to realize the most importance in regards their best interest being respectful as to their viewpoint is the only proper Love we can give those to draw them closer to who they truly DO need, God.” This you don’t agree?
How then will they hear with ears and see with eyes the need to seek such that will only help them?
By simply continuing in some argument, because their firm develop belief, only hampers showing them, by the example as it’s written “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”, yes?

How then will they hear with ears and see with eyes the need to seek such that will only help them?
By simply continuing in some argument, because their firm develop belief, only hampers showing them, by the example as it’s written “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”, yes?
I agree with your observation...arguing for the sake of arguing isn't productive nor does it sway anyone. However, the lack of a discussion does not move philosophy forward (whether religious, political, or otherwise). There has to be discussion in order to understand and be understood. We see this with the enlightenment and the reformation. There's a reason the "dark ages" were dark.
And I agree with you that 'doing unto others' in a sense of good works wins friends and enemies. But good works must be combined with the presentation of truth. As in, 'faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word.' Wouldn't you say?

Yes, just as such will be preached throughout the world to every part of it, every town, village etc., but when you’re dealing with this here free chess site it makes perfect sense Erik wishing to please as best as he can those who oppose such discussions, as a respectful issue, regardless it only is for their best interest.
Bringing me back to that such loving example towards them does better, given you ran into one of them at some fast food joint and had a great conversation with them, and then threw in you’re desire their good news that they can receive such the prize you already have that you only wish you would awake them to understand and experience such as yourself. Then, most assuredly free speech is grand and sensible the simple fact being that you care for them and only wish the best for them, that they are yet to have had anything to bring such recognition across to them, yes?

ok boomers