chess.com censorship: is it going too far?

Sort:
EscherehcsE
Adept_Wolf wrote:
But shouldn’t they use the bot to detect but then a real person to filter

Actually, that would be a good idea, but it would require extra mod manpower. I guess the site wasn't willing to invest the extra time.

AdeptToaster
I was only kidding in my last post
AdeptToaster
Also it would probably be a bit expensive to hire all of those mods
EscherehcsE
Adept_Wolf wrote:
I was only kidding in my last post

Well, this is the interwebz - There's no way for me to know that unless you add a "jk" or a winking thingy on the end of the statement. :-)

1e4-2Nf3isbest

I think this forum needs a bot - or just a mod to lock it.

AdeptToaster
And why is that
AdeptToaster
To outlaw all the questions to the answers
AdeptToaster
?
EscherehcsE
TXBaseballFan wrote:

I think this forum needs a bot - or just a mod to lock it.

That would be their call. It wouldn't bother me either way. However, there are one or two people who might not agree with me. ;-)

1e4-2Nf3isbest
Adept_Wolf wrote:
And why is that

A lot of arguing

EscherehcsE
TXBaseballFan wrote:
Adept_Wolf wrote:
And why is that

A lot of arguing

Well, the thread *was* moved to "Off Topic", which makes it harder to sustain thread contributions and takes it out of the spotlight a bit.

JackRoach
TXBaseballFan wrote:
Adept_Wolf wrote:
And why is that

A lot of arguing

Do you have something against arguing?

EscherehcsE
JackRoach wrote:
TXBaseballFan wrote:
Adept_Wolf wrote:
And why is that

A lot of arguing

Do you have something against arguing?

Uh oh, TXBaseballFan, now you've done it; You've awakened our resident debater, who will apparently argue with a fence post, if necessary. ;-)

JackRoach
EscherehcsE wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
TXBaseballFan wrote:
Adept_Wolf wrote:
And why is that

A lot of arguing

Do you have something against arguing?

Uh oh, TXBaseballFan, now you've done it; You've awakened our resident debater, who will apparently argue with a fence post, if necessary. ;-)

Hey, the fence post hit me first.

 

I got mad when it didn't respond to my interrogations, so I took it down.

pam234

I agree with Andrea. As a fellow female I enjoy an intelligent conversation on other topics other than chess. Sadly with all the children on this site it is difficult to find!

1e4-2Nf3isbest

Oh **** that just ruined my day.

JackRoach
pam234 wrote:

I agree with Andrea. As a fellow female I enjoy an intelligent conversation on other topics other than chess. Sadly with all the children on this site it is difficult to find!

No, it's actually a little easier I think.

Those little kids love talking about clubs and teams, and points and views.

 

And us older kids love nonsense. 

 

 

 

Plenty of off-topic threads, but few good ones.

AunTheKnight
JackRoach wrote:
pam234 wrote:

I agree with Andrea. As a fellow female I enjoy an intelligent conversation on other topics other than chess. Sadly with all the children on this site it is difficult to find!

No, it's actually a little easier I think.

Those little kids love talking about clubs and teams, and points and views.

 

And us older kids love nonsense. 

 

 

 

Plenty of off-topic threads, but few good ones.

Wouldn’t it be “we older kids” because it is a subject? 

 

“We older kids love nonsense.”

1e4-2Nf3isbest
pam234 wrote:

I agree with Andrea. As a fellow female I enjoy an intelligent conversation on other topics other than chess. Sadly with all the children on this site it is difficult to find!

You mean OTHER than chess? There is way to much of that stuff on here. I think there was a post in another thread that said this site was 99% troll threads and 1% chess or something like that.

pam234

@AunTheKnight- Forgive JackRoach he doesn't understand the benefits of good grammar or have the ability to hold an adult conversation. He's good at reporting sick players though. A real tough guy!