♟️ Chess Conspiracy: The Game Is Rigged. The Truth Is Coming Out... 🕵️‍♂️ RED PILL 💊

Rigged. I always play 2000s in the “Rating-Based” tournaments. There are higher-ups that control everything.

Just no.

I did a little analysis, which makes it clear that at that moment in the tournament in the 3rd round I fought with one of @erik 's agents

I will not say publicly what these numbers mean, since it is forbidden to publicly accuse players (despite the fact that I believe that this is not human). technically I did not accuse anyone, I just showed the performance of his game, for the test I used games against opponents of approximately equal rating, I used games from 30 moves, I excluded the first 10 book moves

soft pgn spy made @Mgleason
https://github.com/MGleason1/PGN-Spy

Draw your own conclusions about the strength of his performance

TLK79 - Terminal Logic Kernel 79?

TLK - "Terminal Logic Kernel"
79 - Internal generation or version number

At first glance, TLK79 appears to be just another ordinary system bot.
There are no obvious similarities to CANNIBAL 37 the engine created by @cheater_1 in 2008, which was designed not to win more games, but to be unmateable.

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/cannibal-37-in-testing-phase

CANNIBAL 37 used a secret algorithm focused entirely on survival, forcing draws and preventing checkmate, even against top engines like Deep Blue.

However, compared to CANNIBAL 37, @TLK79 plays more naturally and doesn’t openly show the extreme fortress-building behavior seen in its predecessor.
On the surface, no direct connection can be proven.

But something feels wrong.

There is a hidden instinct for survival in these bots 
a subtle resistance in lost positions, a quiet refusal to be defeated 
that feels like a continuation of CANNIBAL 37’s core idea.

@cheater_1 was banned and sent to prison for his experimental work on CANNIBAL 37
However, it's possible that his forbidden developments were absorbed by others — possibly even by the management behind Chess.com.
If that’s true, CANNIBAL 37’s legacy could have quietly slipped into the system, evolving into what we see today with bots like TLK79.

I don’t have hard evidence yet.
But I strongly suspect that the philosophy behind CANNIBAL 37, focused on unmateability and survival, still influences the bots on this site today.
And I believe it’s being hidden beneath the surface, disguised as just another "friendly" bot.

I strongly ask everyone who encounters bots during live games to report it here.
Your experiences are vital to uncovering the truth.

You are clearly absorbed by your paranoia.

Anyone spending that much energy to isolate a cheater at an online GAME (surprise! It's a game) is obsessed with the fantasy of intrigue.

That you not only accuse the site and it's owner of cheating, for what reason is a mystery, but you actually attempt to link this to your world view that we are all being duped into believing we're free to live our lives while actually being controlled like string puppets.

And, of course like all enlightened conspiracy addicts, you accuse those of us not convince, of being ignorant of the deception we are victims of.

Quite Shutter Island - ish of you.

What puzzles me most is why you actually pay to play here in this filth infested chess site.

I still think you know you're blowing smoke and just enjoying the exposure whether positive or negative.

I feel so smart and self-aware every time I open this thread.

I just opened this thread and I feel like I ate both pills.

The only thing to be learned in threads like this is that there exists in life a certain kind of people best ignored.

I just have too much fun poking the bear to ignore them.

Terminal Logic Kernel 79

he is here

a soulless machine tries to be like a human

Even confronted with evidence you maintain your game. Either brilliant or really dumb.

I have seen countless threads complaining of cheats but the most fun are the high scorers.

800s complain all the time. It's really fun to see a 2000 whining about losing to a "cheater".

Ego much?

I've never rated higher than what this site calls 1200-ish. I beat a legit 1800 player and he freely admitted he made a dumb mistake and I was lucky which I freely agreed with.

Some people forget it's a game and even champs lose once in a while.

Im just going to copy and paste a comment I made earlier again, since it contradicts the evidence this man has "gained".

"

But, we need to take this into the legal terms.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You see, a YouTuber by the name of Corny did a really well explanation of this, so go check that short, not video, out.

So recently, Roblox was sued for a reason that has been redacted, but many people are guessing that it could be on the fact that they may be inflating the amount of users they have.

Now this is illegal and actually could get them into a lot of trouble, now enough about Roblox, we need to talk about chess.com.

If there were “bots on this website, that would be contributing to the player count, yes? And because of this, in the same problem as Roblox, could be a very if not stupidly risky move. Risking this website is just not worth the “bots that you all believe are there”. What would chess.com gain out of this? Nothing! What are we gaining out of this talk? Nothing!

Topic 2: The False Positives.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you do not know what this is, it is explained below,👇.

A false positive is an error in binary classification in which a test result incorrectly indicates the presence of a condition, while a false negative is the opposite error, where the test result incorrectly indicates the absence of a condition when it is actually present. These are the two kinds of errors in a binary test, in contrast to the two kinds of correct result.

…

In this case, the proof that bots exist on this website are full of false positives, and you see, that would entirely disprove the point.

Even if you have done hundreds of tests, those tests could still have a false positives in all of them. Because of this, the likelihood of there being bots on this website are close to none.

Teh End".

We call this topic bs, not facts. Even with proofs, it doesn't stand out as a legitimate reason for having a skill issue. If you lose multiple times, just say it, no need for other excuses. All you can do is to try and improve, it's more easier than making up reasons. No more of this chess consipracy rigged bs, and you might be on some type of white powder that I cannot say.

Or maybe, you can read about this thing called "rating inflation"

The most asked and unanswered conspiracy question is always "why?".

"Control" being the most often claimed reason does not answer the question.

It just requires another question. Control what?

control the mind - control the individual