♟️ Chess Conspiracy: The Game Is Rigged. The Truth Is Coming Out... 🕵️‍♂️ RED PILL 💊

Sort:
RandomChessPlayer62

I request EVIDENCE @Fischer

festers-siesta
noodles2112 wrote:

one thing you forget Billy-bingo - I once believed as you presently do - so I know how you think

Hardly. Your booze soaked brain doesn't even know how YOU think

festers-siesta
RandomChessPlayer62 wrote:

I request EVIDENCE @Fischer

Read his disclaimer. There are no dots.

He's pretending.

noodles2112

critically Billy-bingo - I no longer rely on others to tell me what to think & believe like you still do - and don't even know it !

TheeMafioso
noodles2112 wrote:

many (e.g. Billy-bingo) chalk everything up to purely happenstantial/coincidental because they cannot or will not do their due diligence as far as research/investigation that points clearly to world events transpiring by design - mainly they are motivated by fear of what they might discover that would smash their worldviews to smithereens - much easier to mock & ridicule for them - than to actually seek truth that could potentially threaten their comfortable core beliefs !

they pretend to be informed but that is the last thing they truly desire - willful ignorance is their credo and ignorance is bliss.

Instead of using fancy wording, use actual statistical tests that would support your point.

noodles2112

you can actually perform the test yourself TFD -

I call it the Ignorance is Bliss or IB test .

simply ask random people some controversial "taboo/topic" questions e.g.

"Hypothetically speaking -

if Nasa faked the Apollo moon missions - if 9/11 was an inside job & the 9/11 commission report was a coverup - if the earth was not a spinning globe but was flat & stationary etc.

Would You Really Want to Know?"

you shall discover that most people would rather Not Know!

festers-siesta

One the one hand, noodles claims he doesn't rely on others, then suggests you ask other people what they think.

He constantly searches for others to agree with him and invents them if he can't locate them.

He has no proofs or facts. He will, on occasion, post some ludicrous youtube video, obviously doctored, to claim proof.

Its a waste if time waiting for his supporting details. He has none.

TheeMafioso
Billy-bingo wrote:

One the one hand, noodles claims he doesn't rely on others, then suggests you ask other people what they think.

He constantly searches for others to agree with him and invents them if he can't locate them.

He has no proofs or facts. He will, on occasion, post some ludicrous youtube video, obviously doctored, to claim proof.

Its a waste if time waiting for his supporting details. He has none.

I know.

noodles2112

so called "flat earthers" use the globe model formula for curvature -

as far as the distances to the sun/moon/stars remember what O'Brien said to Winston in Orwell's novel 1984 - " We control matter because we control the mind" - Winston says that is untrue and gives an example of the stars beyond the control of the "inner circle" O'Brien is a part of - mentioning some to be millions of lightyears away. O'Brien informs Winston that his conception of the universe is contrary to reality. Winston has been convinced by the state propaganda that the stars are lightyears away. But O'Brien explains that the stars in reality are very close, and the sun, moon & stars circle the earth , which is the center of the universe. O'Brien informs Winston that his misconception of the universe is the result of the clever work of mathematicians. O'Brien further explains to Winston " The stars can be near or distant, according as we need them. Do you suppose our mathematicians are unequal to that ? Have you forgotten doublethink?"

That is what O'Brien meant by "we control matter because we control the mind."

TheeMafioso
TheFlyingDorito wrote:

But, we need to take this into the legal terms.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You see, a YouTuber by the name of Corny did a really well explanation of this, so go check that short, not video, out.

So recently, Roblox was sued for a reason that has been redacted, but many people are guessing that it could be on the fact that they may be inflating the amount of users they have.

Now this is illegal and actually could get them into a lot of trouble, now enough about Roblox, we need to talk about chess.com.

If there were “bots on this website, that would be contributing to the player count, yes? And because of this, in the same problem as Roblox, could be a very if not stupidly risky move. Risking this website is just not worth the “bots that you all believe are there”. What would chess.com gain out of this? Nothing! What are we gaining out of this talk? Nothing!

Topic 2: The False Positives.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you do not know what this is, it is explained below,👇.

A false positive is an error in binary classification in which a test result incorrectly indicates the presence of a condition, while a false negative is the opposite error, where the test result incorrectly indicates the absence of a condition when it is actually present. These are the two kinds of errors in a binary test, in contrast to the two kinds of correct result.

In this case, the proof that bots exist on this website are full of false positives, and you see, that would entirely disprove the point.

Even if you have done hundreds of tests, those tests could still have a false positives in all of them. Because of this, the likelihood of there being bots on this website are close to none.

Teh End

Noodles proof is full of false positives, and that of unrelated examples too. So any argument of his own if chess was rigged was easily picked apart as there were many of the "False Positives" held within each argument.

TheeMafioso
noodles2112 wrote:

so called "flat earthers" use the globe model formula for curvature -

as far as the distances to the sun/moon/stars remember what O'Brien said to Winston in Orwell's novel 1984 - " We control matter because we control the mind" - Winston says that is untrue and gives an example of the stars beyond the control of the "inner circle" O'Brien is a part of - mentioning some to be millions of lightyears away. O'Brien informs Winston that his conception of the universe is contrary to reality. Winston has been convinced by the state propaganda that the stars are lightyears away. But O'Brien explains that the stars in reality are very close, and the sun, moon & stars circle the earth , which is the center of the universe. O'Brien informs Winston that his misconception of the universe is the result of the clever work of mathematicians. O'Brien further explains to Winston " The stars can be near or distant, according as we need them. Do you suppose our mathematicians are unequal to that ? Have you forgotten doublethink?"

That is what O'Brien meant by "we control matter because we control the mind."

Can you put it back into normal text, as it is hard for me to read.

noodles2112

same text as you use TFD

noodles2112

click the "Light UI" icon in bottom left corner of the screen

TheeMafioso
noodles2112 wrote:

so called "flat earthers" use the globe model formula for curvature -

as far as the distances to the sun/moon/stars remember what O'Brien said to Winston in Orwell's novel 1984 - " We control matter because we control the mind" - Winston says that is untrue and gives an example of the stars beyond the control of the "inner circle" O'Brien is a part of - mentioning some to be millions of lightyears away. O'Brien informs Winston that his conception of the universe is contrary to reality. Winston has been convinced by the state propaganda that the stars are lightyears away. But O'Brien explains that the stars in reality are very close, and the sun, moon & stars circle the earth , which is the center of the universe. O'Brien informs Winston that his misconception of the universe is the result of the clever work of mathematicians. O'Brien further explains to Winston " The stars can be near or distant, according as we need them. Do you suppose our mathematicians are unequal to that ? Have you forgotten doublethink?"

That is what O'Brien meant by "we control matter because we control the mind."

I do not see how this contributes to the topic at hand.

noodles2112

the topic thread "Red Pill" in the title -

or are you referring to something else ?

TheeMafioso
noodles2112 wrote:

the topic thread "Red Pill" in the title -

or are you referring to something else ?

Im talking about the false positives arguments about these topics contain.

noodles2112

please provide an example of a "false positive"

MQRPHY

The less sophisticated, the comfortably numb,
they get their blue copyium doses from “Guess the Elo” threads and “Ban the Person Above You” games
That's where they go to sleep
That’s where the system keeps them pacified, dopamine loops and empty distractions

But you guys…
you come here, and demand proof?

Fine. Start with the tip of the iceberg I’ve already offered you Erik’s accidental account closure, the Kramnik incident, the invisible hand steering the narrative. Go back. Read. Or better yet notice.
You don't need all the answers to see when something doesn't add up.
But I won’t dump the whole weight on you yet. I fear it would collapse your mind. You’re not ready. So I’ll do it slow. Bit by bit.
Like waking someone from a dream they thought was real.

You mock the disclaimer?
You think it's a joke?
Let me decode it for you.

It's the only way we’re allowed to speak here.
Wrapped in irony, laced in performance yes, yes, I’m just a “Matrix fan,” just a role-player, just another “Fischer” impersonator, right?

Hell, I could say the secret services staged my death in 2008, locked me in a psych ward on an island scrubbed from the maps.
That I spent ten years staring at a blank wall while agents in white coats whispered in my ear.
That I was extracted by KGB handlers, flown to Moscow, and now live next door to Snowden. (Quiet guy. Likes tea.)

You wouldn’t believe that, would you?
Of course not.
Because it sounds too much which is how truth always sounds when your entire world has been crafted to keep it hidden.

You want your neat little definitions:
“Who is they?”
“What is the motive?”
“Where’s the documentation?”

But that’s not how control works.
The more complex the system, the more subtle the manipulation.
The most powerful controls aren’t enforced with guns theyre woven into norms, algorithms, assumptions, updates, TOS agreements, moderation policies.
They're built into what you’re allowed to question

But that’s too much for you, right?
Too cinematic.
Too wild.
Easier to call it all a game. Just roleplay. Just satire. Just smoke.

But tell me, Billy-Bingo, RandomChessPlayer62…
If it’s all just smoke why does the room feel so warm?

And one more thing

I’ve been here a long time. Since the beginning
I’ve seen too many cracks in this system to count
I’ll reveal them to you slowly. Not as proof, no
But as food for thought

And maybe, just maybe others will appear
Others who’ve been watching too
Others ready to share what they’ve noticed

If you're one of them don’t stay silent

The system only wins if we stop noticing....

noodles2112

if one doesn't REALLY want to know - no amount of evidence/proof will ever be enough!

festers-siesta

Secret agent man. Come to clean up a chess site.

Hilarious.