See this: even Erik, the CEO of chess.com, made a strong troll with this thread.
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/community/erik-from-chess-com-here-ask-me-almost-anything
His trolling job was complete when he locked the thread without any good reason. I think this is a profound kind of trolling.
Once you define everyone as a troll, the word loses all meaning. There's a philosophical principle about that but I can't be bothered to look it up.
Semantic satiation
Once you define everyone as a troll, the word loses all meaning. There's a philosophical principle about that but I can't be bothered to look it up.
Or format it in bubbles.
No, see the first page.
I said 90% of the active users of chess foruns are trolls. It is easy to prove it.
With that percentage I'm more interested in the small percentage who aren't trolls. Could you name some non-trolls please?
With that percentage I'm more interested in the small percentage who aren't trolls. Could you name some non-trolls please?
The duck, kaynight, tryst, batgirl, nobodyreally.
Kaynight???????????????????????????????????
Yip. Not a troll, imo.
Kaynight???????????????????????????????????
Yip. Not a troll, imo.
I've never read that opinion from anyone, meditating dog. I'm really lost in this whole troll business now. Completely lost
Kaynight???????????????????????????????????
Yip. Not a troll, imo.
I've never read that opinion from anyone, meditating dog. I'm really lost in this whole troll business now. Completely lost
His one-liner mental leaps are often inimitable. I have a collection of them somewhere on my other computer.
Once you define everyone as a troll, the word loses all meaning. There's a philosophical principle about that but I can't be bothered to look it up.
Or format it in bubbles.
No, see the first page.
I said 90% of the active users of chess foruns are trolls. It is easy to prove it.
With that percentage I'm more interested in the small percentage who aren't trolls. Could you name some non-trolls please?
LOGOZAR is definitely a non-troll, for exemple.
Once you define everyone as a troll, the word loses all meaning. There's a philosophical principle about that but I can't be bothered to look it up.
Or format it in bubbles.
No, see the first page.
I said 90% of the active users of chess foruns are trolls. It is easy to prove it.
With that percentage I'm more interested in the small percentage who aren't trolls. Could you name some non-trolls please?
LOGOZAR is definitely a non-troll, for exemple.
I don't know who LOGOZAR is? Can you name some I would know? Like some who are very active in the forums?
Sometimes a post looks like a trolling one, but it is not.
For exemple, see this page link of my thread (copy below).
I just wrote some analysis of my games in a funny way. Some people say it is trolling, but it is not.
Kaynight???????????????????????????????????
Yip. Not a troll, imo.
I've never read that opinion from anyone, meditating dog. I'm really lost in this whole troll business now. Completely lost
His one-liner mental leaps are often inimitable. I have a collection of them somewhere on my other computer.
You mean "keek", "just sayin", "get a life", etc., are inimitable? {good word, had to look it up}
Once you define everyone as a troll, the word loses all meaning. There's a philosophical principle about that but I can't be bothered to look it up.
Or format it in bubbles.
No, see the first page.
I said 90% of the active users of chess foruns are trolls. It is easy to prove it.
With that percentage I'm more interested in the small percentage who aren't trolls. Could you name some non-trolls please?
LOGOZAR is definitely a non-troll, for exemple.
I don't know who LOGOZAR is? Can you name some I would know? Like some who are very active in the forums?
HE is very active, see his profile:
https://www.chess.com/members/view/logozar
You do not know him because HE IS NOT A TROLL !!!!!
Trolls are more famous than non-trolls!!!!
He is very active, but, as he is not a troll, you do not know (or do not remember) him!!!!!!
Another exemple of a non-trolling post.
See the following page of my thread:
The picture below is not a troll. It is just a joke.
JOKE is different of trolling.
You do not know him because HE IS NOT A TROLL !!!!!
Trolls are more famous than non-trolls!!!!
He is very active, but, as he is not a troll, you do not know (or do not remember) him!!!!!!
Then I'll have to start keeping my eye out for him! Is that the only person who isn't a troll?
You do not know him because HE IS NOT A TROLL !!!!!
Trolls are more famous than non-trolls!!!!
He is very active, but, as he is not a troll, you do not know (or do not remember) him!!!!!!
Then I'll have to start keeping my eye out for him! Is that the only person who isn't a troll?
Note the ONLY. He is one of the 10% of non-trolls, among the 100% of active users of chess.com foruns.
Kaynight???????????????????????????????????
Yip. Not a troll, imo.
I've never read that opinion from anyone, meditating dog. I'm really lost in this whole troll business now. Completely lost
His one-liner mental leaps are often inimitable. I have a collection of them somewhere on my other computer.
You mean "keek", "just sayin", "get a life", etc., are inimitable? {good word, had to look it up}
Nope. That's just when he is bored, or more importantly unchallenged. Can't provide examples right now. I'll get back to you.
Once you define everyone as a troll, the word loses all meaning. There's a philosophical principle about that but I can't be bothered to look it up.
Or format it in bubbles.
No, see the first page.
I said 90% of the active users of chess foruns are trolls. It is easy to prove it.