They should make Vote chess, but with a 5-minute TOTAL timer, and it's just between two people. 1 person on each colour.
The lowest that it can be is 10 mins, so it's possible
They should make Vote chess, but with a 5-minute TOTAL timer, and it's just between two people. 1 person on each colour.
The lowest that it can be is 10 mins, so it's possible
sure but don't let anybody under 1900 participate
Thank you, @Chamok. Excluding players below 1900 from participating rules out over 95% of players worldwide, many of whom are not disruptive and have no intention of sabotaging the voting process. For example, my peak rating is 1887, which is very close to 1900, but still not quite there. It’s not just me. 1300-rated players are also strong players who can spot tactics and contribute to the team. I understand that high-rated players often have big egos, but that’s not a reason to deny lower-rated players from participating. Everyone was a beginner once, and they can learn from the game.
(Also I would suggest Caruana.)
I agree, on every point
They should make Vote chess, but with a 5-minute TOTAL timer, and it's just between two people. 1 person on each colour.
Sounds familiar 🤔🤔
We need someone who is active and actually responds to messages if we're gonna do this