we should
Debate scrum
Sort:
DamonevicSmithlov wrote:
Ok, here's a topic. Should we get rid of castling in chess?
What’s the point of getting rid of it???
jij2018 wrote:
it will be funner
How? You can still castle but it’ll just take more moves.
I don’t see the point of getting rid of a move that has been around for ages
DamonevicSmithlov wrote:
This is a good topic, but I'm not sure it's controversial enough. We'll stick with this for now, though.
Ok, here's a topic. Should we get rid of castling in chess?
May 6, 2020
0
#47
ChessSensasian wrote:
DamonevicSmithlov wrote:
Ok, here's a topic. Should we get rid of castling in chess?
What’s the point of getting rid of it???
I agree, There's no point in getting rid of it
I have one. Will.Magnus hold the title for 10 more years?
TheGreatAttorney wrote:
I have one. Will.Magnus hold the title for 10 more years?
I don’t follow him
May 6, 2020
0
#50
Hmm, ok . . .
1. For SSBU, was Byleth's addition to the roster a good one? Pass. I don't know what SSBU is or who Byleth is.
2. Should the sister go to the beach? No, absolutely not. Don't go to the beach. The sister is in quarantine for a reason, she may be infected. She may infect many others who in turn would do the same. And if she is not infected, she might become infected. There is too much to lose.
3. Will Kabib be defeated? Who? In what? Pass - no idea.
4. Marriage is like a game of chess. No. Chess is a game where each player tries to defeat the other. Marriage is a partnership where each person supports the other. True, it doesn't always end up that way, but when a game of chess starts and a marriage starts, both start out with very different intentions.
5. Tom Nook is a crook. I don't know Tom Nook; apparently he is with the mob. If this is true, by definition he would be a crook. However, no proof has been offered that he is affiliated with any criminal organization; therefore, we can't say if he is a crook or not. He may still be a crook even if he is not with the mob, but we just don't know.
6. "I LIKE TRUMP" - Cannot debate someone's personal opinion. You like Trump, you should know.
7. Should we get rid of Castling in Chess? No. Castling was not an original part of chess. It was developed to add another dimension to the game. The originators thought it was a good idea and centuries of game play have proven this correct. It adds to the game. Removing Castling would diminish the game and be a step backward. Keep castling.
8. Will Magnus hold the title for 10 more years? While possible, the odds are likely against that happening. If I had to guess, I would guess no. But it's only a guess and guesses don't count for much in any debate . . . 
Wazir20 wrote:
@m_connors so we can't say that marriage and chess are totally different bcoz they have similarity also!
What similarity are you talking about???
Idk
Wazir20 wrote:
@chessSensasian Chess is about planning and dealing with winning and losing... same in marriage we have to understand clearly about our decisions, choices and mistakes bcoz its effect goes on both partner...
...
I see where you are trying to go for. But still, it is a bit different.
Marriage, in a sentence, isn’t staring into the eyes of the one your spouse, but looking toward the same direction in life with the one you love...if that makes sense.
Chess is about strategizing, but marriage isn’t a game. People treat it like that and their marriages fall apart because of it. Marriage is a much more serious relationship.
In chess, you can always play another game, but in marriage...it’s so much more complex.
May 7, 2020
0
#57
In chess you dont have to clean the chess board after playing. In marriage, you have to clean the mess you made.
4gotten_legend wrote:
huh weirdos
Huh...I 4got you were here @4gotten
Wazir20 wrote:
@ChessSensasian i saw 2 great chess players in love and their happy married life in real life
But just because they are chess players doesn’t mean chess and marriage go hand in hand.
Wazir20 wrote:
@ChessSensasian u said their marriages fall apart bcoz of it... so just bcoz chess and marriage have some comman issues, doesn't mean marriage will not work if we apply some chess rule in it... may be marriage will be more lovely if we apply the art of chess in it :D
What do you mean apply chess rule?
Because chess is a game, chess can be played over and over. There’s no problem with starting over.
On the other hand, if you treat marriage as a game like chess, and you think you are losing or not in a good position etc and just gave up on it, then that’s how marriages can fall apart.
When you treat marriage as a game, you think you can just try again. But marriage is a commitment. Till death do us apart.
There’s little similarity between marriage and games.
Yea