Does True Randomness Actually Exist?

Sort:
Thee_Ghostess_Lola

there is only now - that is why its referred to as the/a "present" !

the present may not be a gift to me. esp if u took away my hope.

DiogenesDue
Thee_Ghostess_Lola wrote:

i would like to know if time is actually ever so slowly accelerating ? presuppose the BB and space is increasing right ? i feel that randomness could be tied to the S-T Continuum, but i hafta associate w/ the S-T C first...which i havent so there. are there randomness follicles s/h joined to consciousness ?

Relative to...what?

BlueHairedFemboy13
no.
noodles2112

time is now - there is no other time

Thee_Ghostess_Lola

how do u know time is even now ? ...what proof do u have ?

noodles2112

you

Thee_Ghostess_Lola

im a transparent so thiss my second time around. i was born on 10.31.1550 and died on the nite a my 25th birthday (1575). I got born again on halloween nite 1975. now...trust me. things have changed in those 400 yrs. like alot. but lets not yump to conclusions and say for a fact that time has advanced. well....u can - but not me.

noodles2112

time is subjective - ever heard the phrases "time flies when you're having fun" or "time drags when you're bored in the doldrums"

DeltaCrimson

Isn't radioactive decay truly random?

Thee_Ghostess_Lola

if time is subjective to a one or to all ? ...then is it s/h connected to consciousness ?

noodles2112

when asked how's life - some answer "too short" - others answer "taking forever" !

Thee_Ghostess_Lola

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdQY7BusJNU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ur57IunS9To

oodles ? ...if u could put time in a bottle ? ...would u save it ? ...drink it ? ...or smash it on a ship ?

noodles2112

I'd freeze it in liquid nitrogen

PowerChess52
I am mitsuri
Elroch
noodles2112 wrote:

time is subjective - ever heard the phrases "time flies when you're having fun" or "time drags when you're bored in the doldrums"

These are true statements about subjective time.

They are not of much use for time measured on an atomic clock.

Elroch
DeltaCrimson wrote:

Isn't radioactive decay truly random?

Yes. That is strong randomness. The reason is that we have basically no knowledge of the nuclear state before a decay event, other than that it has not yet decayed!

noodles2112

I prefer a Plutonic Clock

im-emma

i want food

PowerChess52
Stray kids hoo
CharmxCharisma

If you're looking for the answer to anything like this, you probably won't find it on OTF.