Oh wow! elroch and his accomplices ended up stealing this forum??? I mean counterfeiting it or whatever.
Oh wow! elroch and his accomplices ended up stealing this forum??? I mean counterfeiting it or whatever.
just got back from miami & went to the end a hiway 1. we stayed at the arya in coco grove and the opal in key west. it was really fun !...never knew gulf & western music. its hilarious !!
heres one a my favorites that this guy played:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VKGfluxZWw
you know, still didn’t make it to colombia. been twice to peru but wasn’t allowed in the land of troubles.. lol. is life treating you well lately?
now i feel like saying something about TR, but it just too.. on topic. lol
i know, i know.. lol. but i feel like a leprechaun today.. and want to stash this definition before i forget it.. blame determinism for the sake of objectively.. lol
“True-randomness is the type of randomness that is not produced by a deterministic process.“
i know, i know.. lol. but i feel like a leprechaun today.. and want to stash this definition before i forget it.. blame determinism for the sake of objectively.. lol
“True-randomness is the type of randomness that is not produced by a deterministic process.“
Everything has a Causation... so Its casually linked back to the big bang.
So I guess if you wanna have a very Stricti definition of randomness then its gaps in casualty EVEN MORE its the LACK OF ANY GOVERNING LAWS including the laws of math and logic itself so you get "True" randomness
‘Everything has a Causation... so Its casually linked back to the big bang. So I guess if you wanna have a very Stricti definition of randomness then its gaps in casualty..’
i feel kinda trespassing, but here goes anyways..
my definition is not a good one, and can be improved, but i think it’s sufficient for anyone that familiar with the concept of causal determinism to understand. as well as its the correct context for this thread.
if you prefer to define TR in terms of causality rather than determinism, that’s fancy. but there’s no need to go as far as talking about gaps in causality and such, that’s sound a bit like magic
you can simply say that “TR is the process of divergent causality” or something.. i’m not the right person to ask for the correct wording, but by “divergent causality” i mean a situation where a single cause can lead to multiple possible outcomes or effects, rather than a deterministic relationship between cause and effect.
say it differently, i think that causality is solid and shouldn’t be violated regardless if determinism or indeterminism turn out to be true.
maybe if i catch statler and waldorf in a tranquil mood they will help with the definition.. lol. sound like a bad idea, but.. oh well, not my first..
seems open to me...and i TY Ukey for this wonderful spool !