Evolution theory, fact or fantasy?

Sort:
Tesla-jr

This forum is created in response to my highly debated banning from the "Evolution and nothing else" forum. Just read the facts I posted on the said forum, and tell me where I was wrong. My hope is to counter the biased evolutionary forum with a free forum where truth can be spoken. And I want science here!

Tesla-jr

I invite anyone and everyone to debate me on this forum, but I won't bann anyone who disagrees with me

Joseph-S
Teslajr wrote:

 

This forum is created in response to my highly debated banning from the "Evolution and nothing else" forum. Just read the facts I posted on the said forum, and tell me where I was wrong. My hope is to counter the biased evolutionary forum with a free forum where truth can be spoken

Evolution theory, fact or fantasy?

  Totally fiction!

Ziggy_Zugzwang

I'll give an opinion but won't debate beyond a certain point. There are usually two explanations given to how humans and other species were created: 1/ Evolution and 2/The God "Magic Wand" principle.

I believe in a combination of the two(**), where the creator, in a partial sense (*) isn't "God" but ETs(interdimensionals). I believe based on what I have read and reasoned that humans in particular, have and are bred as farm animals for our emotional energy to be harvested. ("Don't feed your demons" is to be understood in more than a metaphorical sense .)

Notes:

(*) Wolves were created by evolution, but dogs and their particular breeds can said to have been created by man.

 (**) Of course I could always frame my explaination ET + evolution to equate with "God", because I always maintain "God" is not a question of true or false but definition.

Ziggy_Zugzwang

I know...I wonder how much time will go by "after they haven't gone back" it will be necessary for the establishment to admit this ? Kaynight, you may also want to look into the extent to which other NASA stuff is faked. I think the Russian faked a lot of stuff as well.

Twpsyn

Good luck Teslajr...  the're a tough crowd!

PlayChessPoorly
It's actually all fan fiction.
Tesla-jr

Hey man did walk on the moon, my dad watched it happen.

Tesla-jr

Are you saying that evolution is fictionLaughing?

Tesla-jr

Ok, any competent scientist who wishes to debate me can begin by explaining the following disproofs for evolution:

polonium halos

The lack of dust on the moon 

The rate at which the moon is spinning away from earth. 

The young age of the earths magnetosphere

The lack of salt in the ocean

The law of biogenisis

The Law of entropy, (the second law of thermodynamics)

the fact that two planets and multiple moons are spinning backwards

the laser flatness of the earths layers

the complete lack of any transitional forms

the human brain

the law of irreducible complexity

Tesla-jr
Ziggy_Zugzwang wrote:

I know...I wonder how much time will go by "after they haven't gone back" it will be necessary for the establishment to admit this ? Kaynight, you may also want to look into the extent to which other NASA stuff is faked. I think the Russian faked a lot of stuff as well."

 

Tesla-jr

NASA hasn"t returned to the moon due to budget cuts, and how do you explain the fact that someone placed the laser measurement transponder on the moon. 

clms_chess
kaynight wrote:

Man did not walk on the moon.

I knowwww....we faked out the world...not once but 6 times!...

and thennnnn lol.... just to cover our "A".... we really went to the moon...

you know.... when we reallllly could...

in secret.....shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

and left all the Apolo moon junk up there...

along with foot prints all over the supposed 6 lunar landing sites...

LOLOL

Gawwwwd we are good! :D

Senior-Lazarus_Long

- Dilbert by Scott Adams

u0110001101101000
Tesla-jr wrote:

polonium halos

This is not related to evolution, but I gave you a link. You said it only attacked the person, but it gave an explanation for the halos: that radon gas traveled through fractures. Radon gas is an alpha emitter.

The rate at which the moon is spinning away from earth. 

This has nothing to do with evolution (but also it's not a problem for the suggested age of the earth)

The law of biogenisis

Evolution doesn't attempt to explain the origin of life. Biogenisis vs abiogenesis isn't relevant to evolution.

The Law of entropy, (the second law of thermodynamics)
This is a funny one because you could use the same argument for being unable to heat a cup of coffee because heating it would cause entropy to decrease! Yes, but localized decreasing entropy is never a problem. It is only impossible for closed systems and the earth is not a closed system.

the complete lack of any transitional forms

There are transitional forms.

the law of irreducible complexity
This is not a law, but an idea. Proposed irreducibly complex things have been shown to be reducible such as the eye, blood clotting, and immune system.

 

Twpsyn

I'm glad at least one of you took my advice!

u0110001101101000

At first I didn't see any arguments so I ignored it happy.png

Senior-Lazarus_Long

We are a transitional form between apes and what we will be a million years from now.

SofiaCherry1

I don't believe in evolution.

SofiaCherry1

I googled the first form of life and it showed that bacteria were the first.

This forum topic has been locked