Fake photos on profiles

Sort:
Avatar of TheChairmaker
DarkLink182 wrote:

You force a defensive role onto someone in a public domain, setting the tone of overtly criticizing and condemning before making any effort to understand what is going on. And you seriously expect response under those circumstances?

Well you have responded, so what is your reason for coming to the defence of this individual?  Do you "understand what is going on"?  If so, please share your insight with us.  

Avatar of Samster7

No reason to bump this up, you're just a lonely bully.

Avatar of TheChairmaker
Samster7 wrote:

No reason to bump this up, you're just a lonely bully.

I presume you are another "friend" of the star of this forum thread.  You are a member of the same group that "she" SAs.  Is that your real photo, or is there anything more you'd like to share with us, Sam?  

Avatar of kco

ding

Avatar of kco

ding

Avatar of TheChairmaker
kco wrote:

ding

Whit are you, an incomplete Avon lady?  You're supposed to add a "dong". 

Avatar of TheChairmaker
[COMMENT DELETED]
Avatar of TheChairmaker

Careful what you ask for, or the next video up will be Andy Stewart's greatest hits.  Which should fill all of 45 seconds.  

Avatar of DarkLink182

I do not come for the defence of the individual involved. I just pose the idea that this is not the way to get what you aim for. Most people have a reason for the behaviour they display, including why they wish to hide themselves. Take that into account. I sometimes use a name that is not my own to limit the possibilities of being personally targeted. I think that a more generalized discussion would have been a more effective way to get what you want.

Avatar of kayak21
TheChairmaker wrote:

Careful what you ask for, or the next video up will be Andy Stewart's greatest hits.  Which should fill all of 45 seconds.  

I think you mean Andy Stewart's greatest hit.

Avatar of kayak21

Donald where's your trooosers. :)

Avatar of TheChairmaker
DarkLink182 wrote:

I do not come for the defence of the individual involved. I just pose the idea that this is not the way to get what you aim for. Most people have a reason for the behaviour they display, including why they wish to hide themselves. Take that into account. I sometimes use a name that is not my own to limit the possibilities of being personally targeted. I think that a more generalized discussion would have been a more effective way to get what you want.

I'm sure people have reasons for their behaviour, and it is not always obvious or apparently rational.  And when someone is setting out to deliberately deceive those around them, it may not be wise to believe what they tell you after they have been caught out.  

This thread was prompted by one individual in particular, who has conspicuously declined to come here and publicly discuss their actions.  That is their pregogative, but in the absence of any feeback it seems reasonable to speculate about their true motives. 

Avatar of TheChairmaker
kayak21 wrote:

Donald where's your trooosers. :)

They've been photoshopped away!  (Interthread reference, five points to me. Laughing)

Avatar of kayak21

Let's not go into their pregogative. EmbarassedLaughing

Avatar of kayak21
TheChairmaker wrote:
kayak21 wrote:

Donald where's your trooosers. :)

They've been photoshopped away!  (Interthread reference, five points to me. )

I could put some pants on them. Wink

Avatar of TheChairmaker
kayak21 wrote:
TheChairmaker wrote:
kayak21 wrote:

Donald where's your trooosers. :)

They've been photoshopped away!  (Interthread reference, five points to me. )

I could put some pants on them.

Whit, on the bare-arsed kilties?  Only if said pants spell out an appropriate message.  Laughing

Avatar of kayak21
TheChairmaker wrote:
kayak21 wrote:
TheChairmaker wrote:
kayak21 wrote:

Donald where's your trooosers. :)

They've been photoshopped away!  (Interthread reference, five points to me. )

I could put some pants on them.

Whit, on the bare-arsed kilties?  Only if said pants spell out an appropriate message.  

I might get muted or banned.

Avatar of TheChairmaker
kayak21 wrote:
TheChairmaker wrote:
kayak21 wrote:
TheChairmaker wrote:
kayak21 wrote:

Donald where's your trooosers. :)

They've been photoshopped away!  (Interthread reference, five points to me. )

I could put some pants on them.

Whit, on the bare-arsed kilties?  Only if said pants spell out an appropriate message.  

I might get muted or banned.

You could pm it to me.  If I think it's OK I'll post it.  If not, I'll still post it, and I'll get muted or banned.   

 

Avatar of kayak21

That's me done for today. Be good. Wink

Avatar of TheChairmaker

I can't promise that, but I will try to be careful.  

Nighty-night, kay.  

This forum topic has been locked