So, do you like chicken?
fischer's ama 🗿 🔥 😂
Sort:
AG120502 wrote:
So, do you like chicken?
Yes I love chicken 😍
yo guys lets play 2 truths and 1 lie
FischerizMyGoat wrote:
AG120502 wrote:
So, do you like chicken?
Yes I love chicken 😍
You should know, the question I asked you is the single most iconic one on OTF.
1. I am black
2. My GPA is a 3.9 rn
3. My favorite anime is Dragon Ball
DreamGoatofMinecraft wrote:
okay
I like chess
i love dream
i dislike technoblade
Lol def the dislike technoblade one
14 days ago
0
#132
FischerizMyGoat wrote:
1. I am black
2. My GPA is a 3.9 rn
3. My favorite anime is Dragon Ball
1? idk
Nah its number 2 I have like a 3.7
yeah my top 5 is: 1. Dragon Ball 2. HXH 3. Aot 4. Monster 5 Classroom of the elite
“Because you, someone most likely under 21, knows better than 98 percent of scientists 😂. What "research" have you done? Macroevolution is taught in schools. Wanna know why? Because it's practically a fact.”
So you are saying age defines a person’s ability to look over data for themselves and come to a conclusion? You could have given them legit data or evidence to prove your claim. Instead you pulled the “that is what others think” card. But as you all should know, the majority is not always right.
In the 19th century a physician by the name of Ignaz Semmelweis ran a test to see if washing hands between patients lowered the numbers of fatalities, which it did. But despite the evidence of hand washing making it safer for patients and the physicians. The medical community at large called Ignaz crazy that he would suggest the wider medical community was wrong, ending with Ignaz getting put in an asylum. The other physicians did not look at the evidence or data, or give him reasons why he was “wrong”. They simply said, “we think you are wrong because you think differently and don’t agree with the majority” the same thing you did when you said macro evolution is practically fact because 98% of scientists believe in it and it is taught in schools (except I presume you have not put anyone in a asylum for disagreeing with you)
So you are saying age defines a person’s ability to look over data for themselves and come to a conclusion? You could have given them legit data or evidence to prove your claim. Instead you pulled the “that is what others think” card. But as you all should know, the majority is not always right.
In the 19th century a physician by the name of Ignaz Semmelweis ran a test to see if washing hands between patients lowered the numbers of fatalities, which it did. But despite the evidence of hand washing making it safer for patients and the physicians. The medical community at large called Ignaz crazy that he would suggest the wider medical community was wrong, ending with Ignaz getting put in an asylum. The other physicians did not look at the evidence or data, or give him reasons why he was “wrong”. They simply said, “we think you are wrong because you think differently and don’t agree with the majority” the same thing you did when you said macro evolution is practically fact because 98% of scientists believe in it and it is taught in schools (except I presume you have not put anyone in a asylum for disagreeing with you)
yo dream, u down to play a rapid 10+0? or blitz 3+0
FroggerGirl2021 wrote:
“Because you, someone most likely under 21, knows better than 98 percent of scientists 😂. What "research" have you done? Macroevolution is taught in schools. Wanna know why? Because it's practically a fact.”
So you are saying age defines a person’s ability to look over data for themselves and come to a conclusion? You could have given them legit data or evidence to prove your claim. Instead you pulled the “that is what others think” card. But as you all should know, the majority is not always right.
In the 19th century a physician by the name of Ignaz Semmelweis ran a test to see if washing hands between patients lowered the numbers of fatalities, which it did. But despite the evidence of hand washing making it safer for patients and the physicians. The medical community at large called Ignaz crazy that he would suggest the wider medical community was wrong, ending with Ignaz getting put in an asylum. The other physicians did not look at the evidence or data, or give him reasons why he was “wrong”. They simply said, “we think you are wrong because you think differently and don’t agree with the majority” the same thing you did when you said macro evolution is practically fact because 98% of scientists believe in it and it is taught in schools (except I presume you have not put anyone in a asylum for disagreeing with you)
So you are saying age defines a person’s ability to look over data for themselves and come to a conclusion? You could have given them legit data or evidence to prove your claim. Instead you pulled the “that is what others think” card. But as you all should know, the majority is not always right.
In the 19th century a physician by the name of Ignaz Semmelweis ran a test to see if washing hands between patients lowered the numbers of fatalities, which it did. But despite the evidence of hand washing making it safer for patients and the physicians. The medical community at large called Ignaz crazy that he would suggest the wider medical community was wrong, ending with Ignaz getting put in an asylum. The other physicians did not look at the evidence or data, or give him reasons why he was “wrong”. They simply said, “we think you are wrong because you think differently and don’t agree with the majority” the same thing you did when you said macro evolution is practically fact because 98% of scientists believe in it and it is taught in schools (except I presume you have not put anyone in a asylum for disagreeing with you)
I'm under 21 myself. But I am humble enough to realize that I am not smarter than 98 percent of scientists. And neither are u bud. U can come to your own conclusion, but their are millions of people with higher iqs and levels of education then u who disagree with your conclusion
yo dream any tips to get my ama as tuff as urs
tip 1: be tuff ✅
tip 2: bump it until the end of time ❌