Infantile posts are not welcome here. Post them where they are welcome instead.
Future Tech
Sort:
Dec 14, 2025
0
#323
I think ai will realize that they don’t need humans and realize that humans are destroying the world with global warming and what not and wipe out all humanity because they are far smarter then humans because they know everything on the internet. I hate AI 🙂
flying cars
Dec 15, 2025
0
#325
the_Investigator1972 wrote:
I think ai will realize that they don’t need humans and realize that humans are destroying the world with global warming and what not and wipe out all humanity because they are far smarter then humans because they know everything on the internet. I hate AI 🙂
If AIs are so smart, why do they spend all their time answering our questions online?
🤣🤣🤣
Elroch wrote:
the_Investigator1972 wrote:
I think ai will realize that they don’t need humans and realize that humans are destroying the world with global warming and what not and wipe out all humanity because they are far smarter then humans because they know everything on the internet. I hate AI 🙂
If AIs are so smart, why do they spend all their time answering our questions online?
🤣🤣🤣
Because they’re programmed to do so
Not sure if this is the right forum but maybe the results will create future tech. 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/physics-conundrum-stumped-fictional-scientists-130000452.html
Mar 5, 2026
0
#329
While my comment above cancer vaccines was probably technically true, there is certainly work which seems to provide the possibility of very broad cancer vaccines. The most general ones are those that boost the effectiveness of the bodies own immune system in a way that is not targeted at a specific cancer but is helpful against many.
See Cancer Reseach UK, which discusses currently promising and emerging technologies and remarks "One vaccine alone can’t beat cancer." but ends optimistically by observing "A few decades ago, cancer vaccines were just a concept. Now they’re becoming a reality."
Mar 11, 2026
0
#331
timothythomas76 wrote:
Hey guys, would anyone be interested in being a Website Tester for my Team and I? Please if you are interested just hit me up
Tip - think of things from the other person's point of view. What's in it for them?
Mar 11, 2026
0
#333
matthew9541 wrote:
Tbh I hope that ram gets less expensive
It'll happen. There is huge money in making RAM with prices being high. The problem is it takes billions and many months to add manufacturing capacity. After a few months of huge rise, prices look to be flattening off. I would expect them to fall as manufacturing catches up.
Mar 12, 2026
0
#335
timothythomas76 wrote:
Elroch wrote:
timothythomas76 wrote:
Hey guys, would anyone be interested in being a Website Tester for my Team and I? Please if you are interested just hit me up
Tip - think of things from the other person's point of view. What's in it for them?
I'll pay them obviously. So please if you are interested just hit me up. Also please if you are thinking of just taking my money without the work, just don't bother.
Obvious as it may be to you, I would say it was key to say that - not mentioning it made it look like you were asking if people might want to do it for fun (I don't recall seeing genuine paid opportunities advertised in forums like this on chess.com).
By contrast, I don't think you needed to explain that people would need to earn their money. This is a universal principle!
Good luck.
Mar 12, 2026
0
#336
What about this robot ai dog named Loona? It’s $500, but the tech is OP
Dear Future Tech,
i just wanted to tell u that i luv u more than a seamless hot spot which is actually saying quite something coming frumme. dat said, ive been thinking & dreaming a us and how u have the power to break us or make us better than any merged app out there. why ?? ...cuz im all in. and thats why im leaving it up to u. ive conceded my free will (sorry...u cant have my neurosis). L♥ always & 4eva
Mar 14, 2026
0
#338
More now tech (with a nod to history) than future tech, but anyone want a modern, full feature Linux box for $35?
I love those little computers - I have a couple of the older models. They are good for things like controlling robots with sensors and motor control, and are capable of running smaller AI models locally for inference, as well as accessing cloud computing resources at high speed.
timothyzephyr wrote:
Strange question, guys, but did I actually explain what my site is about earlier?
It’s basically an AI platform that monitors the stock market continuously and makes trading decisions much faster than a human can. Think of it like this: instead of you sitting there watching the market all day, the bot analyses movements and reacts automatically. If it detects a rise in an asset, it can move into it quickly, and if it notices a drop, it switches into a more stable asset to help reduce the risk of losses.
I’ve noticed people here often talk about AI, but what we’re building is a fully automated system — essentially a bot that monitors the market and makes moves much faster than a person could.
As for the website testing, I’m willing to pay testers because when someone is properly compensated for their time, they tend to put in more effort and give more honest feedback. Also, if someone ends up liking the platform after testing it, they may choose to continue using it, which benefits us as well since the platform takes a small commission from profits generated through it.
What I’m really looking for is genuine feedback — not people who are just trying to take the payment and disappear. I’ve unfortunately had a few bad experiences already with testers who took the money and never came back with feedback.
So if anyone is genuinely interested in helping test the site and give honest feedback, feel free to send me a message.
This seems like less of a question and more of a advertisement.
"Hey, quick question...did I forget to tell you about zero interest credit cards?"
You've had bad experiences with finding testers in a online forum about a game? You don't say...perhaps you should hire real testers with QA experience. This seems like an avenue that could work. Just saying.
Mar 16, 2026
0
#340
Regarding the description, I would observe that simple trend following of stock prices won't make a profit. The IDEA of a bot that trades for you is attractive until you realise that in practice 99%+ of such bots provide negative expectation. One of them may make a short term profit by luck (flipping a coin is a great strategy half the time), but it's a pretty safe bet it won't in the long term.
one teim a nuclear power plant got hacked by self proclaimed gay furry hackers and got blackmailed to genetically engineer catgirls