Engines have their limitations. Pattern recognition can see in a second what an engine can't see after millions or billions of moves. They make less errors on average though, so will win games.
AI is a different from chess engines though. Humans are animals with many intellectual limitations. If technology continues to advance to the AI singularity, it's hard to say what will happen to us. Extinction would sort of be nice 
and not so unexpected.
NO!!!!!!!!! WE'RE ALL DOOMED!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Extinction? What the heck, like yeah, I would like overpopulation not to exist, but I am a chicken, I want to live.
Technology doesn't just "grant us" things, as if it were some mystical, benevolent being.
Technology is created (and advanced) by human minds.
Extinction? What the heck, like yeah, I would like overpopulation not to exist, but I am a chicken, I want to live.
Extinction doesn't mean I die, it means humanity dies.
Sure, I'm human, but I'll die anyway, with or without AI.
That's a really positive way of looking at it... I like this.
computers can perform exhaustive chess analysis? since when?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solving_chess
Nope, it seems many lay people fervently believe that because we have pattern recognition, this is an advantage. Suggesting that computers would be better off with pattern recognition.
You throw in wonderful sounding words from computer science without having an understanding of those words. Pattern recognition by AI (neural networks as a classical example) has a really long history already, If it's used by chess-engines is another side.
Also when it comes to Computer and their programming it's not only about algos, especially in AI
the approuch of dealing with given information has developed the last decades enormously,
better reflecting and integration of the context the activity needs to be done,
a learning process according to a 'history', including the ability to change originally designed workflow.
There's so much and it's way more than just the words: Computer and an algo calculating out the best move.
Computers do not have complex relationship-based informational neural networks. We do. At least I can Read and Articulate.
yes, ignorance is RATHER sad
Extinction? What the heck, like yeah, I would like overpopulation not to exist, but I am a chicken, I want to live.
Extinction doesn't mean I die, it means humanity dies.
Sure, I'm human, but I'll die anyway, with or without AI.
Wtf? If humanity dies, YOU die.
Explain me like im five please. Thanks.
complex relationship-based informational neural networks.
What is your meaning of these words?
we do live in denial , we seem to assume we cannot live without computers , this isnt so , most of our history wasnt cabbage before babbage
Oh and I can see denial waving goodbye
God it looks like denial, must be the clouds in my eyes
my dads bigger than your dad
and they call this the actions of mature wise leaders
You're a few decades late. Deep blue won the 1997 match, and talk of AI has been in science fiction for much longer.
Also you seem to not know what autistic means.