Global Cooling - The real danger to mankind

Sort:
Avatar of ExploringWA
EndgameEnthusiast2357 wrote:

Overnight lows still falling into the 40s most nights, still a frigid spring here i guess..

I can’t believe that you keep engaging History. Absolutely nothing he says is of any value. I have to assume you are just pushing his easy buttons?

Avatar of lfPatriotGames
ExploringWA wrote:

A few feet of snow caused by “global warming.”

My grandmother used to say "it's too cold to snow".

Avatar of ExploringWA

Washington State declared a drought emergency when we are at 104% of rain already and it’s coming down now, reservoirs are at 137% of capacity for this time of year, and snow is building in the mountains by the feet. The drought is a lie to unlock federal funding which the current administration is stealing.

Avatar of lfPatriotGames
ExploringWA wrote:

Washington State declared a drought emergency when we are at 104% of rain already and it’s coming down now, reservoirs are at 137% of capacity for this time of year, and snow is building in the mountains by the feet. The drought is a lie to unlock federal funding which the current administration is stealing.

You guys are amateurs. A couple years ago California was in a drought emergency AND a flood emergency. At the same time. If you REALLY want people to be scared of climate you have to convince them that no matter what happens, it's bad. Probably really, really bad.

Avatar of ExploringWA

21” of snow at Timberline since 4:00pm yesterday and it is still coming down. Once again the climate alarmists yelling drought have no idea what they are talking about. 

Avatar of ExploringWA

More Washington drought

Avatar of EndgameEnthusiast2357

Hit 90 today in Central Park, in April. Climaters must be really losing their minds. I loved it tho!

Avatar of ExploringWA
EndgameEnthusiast2357 wrote:

Hit 90 today in Central Park, in April. Climaters must be really losing their minds. I loved it tho!

More Washington drought as of 5 minutes ago. 

Avatar of EndgameEnthusiast2357

That would be quite miserable flying weather I'd have to say tho, ugh.

Avatar of ExploringWA
EndgameEnthusiast2357 wrote:

That would be quite miserable flying weather I'd have to say tho, ugh.

I would assume so. 😳

Avatar of 876543Z1

Unusually a more realistic article from the BBC (Biased Broadcasting Corporation)

Indicating electric heat pumps more expensive to run than natural gas boilers.

Also daring to approach the subject of associated costs around intermittent energy windmills etc.

Bottom line, the so called renewable world more expensive for UK consumers.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c86ey5n9vx9o

Avatar of ExploringWA

Why people from the Pacific NW of the USA laugh at climate alarmism. Welcome to Spring!

Avatar of ExploringWA

Except the ice is getting deeper and expanding, not retreating. 
https://indiandefencereview.com/one-wrong-variable-climate-formula-sea-levels-rise-35-faster-current-models-show/

Avatar of lfPatriotGames
ExploringWA wrote:

Why people from the Pacific NW of the USA laugh at climate alarmism. Welcome to Spring!

36 degrees last night, and predicting frost tonight. The fruit trees are in full bloom. I don't think it's supposed to be freezing in the middle of April.

I don't know about anyone else's trees, but mine like heat, not cold.

Avatar of lfPatriotGames

A tragic story from KOIN today. A 34 year old died in a car crash yesterday near Welches. Apparently the unexpected amount of snow was a factor. It makes you wonder how many people are injured, or die, in car crashes related to heat vs. cold.

Avatar of ExploringWA

The Great Sequestration: A Volumetric Argument for Receding Global Oceans

Abstract: For decades, the prevailing climatological narrative has focused on eustatic sea-level rise driven by thermal expansion and glacial melt. However, a "Signal-to-Noise" analysis of raw physical data—including polar mass accumulation, planetary angular momentum, and maritime industrial behavior—suggests a contrary phenomenon. This paper argues that the Earth is currently experiencing a "Great Sequestration," wherein massive moisture transport to the poles is banking the planet's water in the form of high-latitude ice, leading to a net drop in effective ocean levels at mid-latitude coastal benchmarks.

I. The Volumetric Discrepancy: The "5-Foot" Variable

The foundational math of the receding ocean theory rests on the rate of polar accumulation versus the latency of glacial discharge. Current observations in the Antarctic interior indicate an average annual snow accumulation of approximately 5 feet (1.524 meters).

When applied to the 14 \text{ million km}^2 Antarctic landmass, this represents an annual sequestration of roughly 21,336 \text{ km}^3 of water equivalent.

• The Math: Spreading this volume across the global ocean surface (361 \text{ million km}^2) would result in a theoretical sea-level drop of 54 \text{ mm} (2.1 inches) per year.

• The Latency Factor: Mainstream models argue this is balanced by ice-shelf calving. However, if the time-of-travel for ice from the interior to the coast is measured in millennia, the current rate of "input" at the poles is fundamentally decoupled from the current rate of "output" at the edges. This creates a massive, real-time "withdrawal" from the global ocean bucket.

II. Geomechanical Evidence: Earth’s Speeding Rotation

A critical, unadjusted physical "signal" is the Earth’s rotational speed. According to the conservation of angular momentum (the "Figure Skater Effect"), a planet speeds up when its mass moves toward its axis of rotation (the poles).

• The Signal: In recent years, Earth has recorded its shortest days on record.

• The Interpretation: While "noise" in the data attributes this to core-mantle coupling, the most direct physical explanation is the massive transfer of water mass from the equator to the poles. If the oceans were melting into the sea and spreading toward the equator, the Earth’s rotation would slow down. The observed acceleration is a direct indicator of polar mass gain.

III. Infrastructure and Morphological Benchmarks

The physical world provides "fixed" benchmarks that contradict the adjusted satellite data (GMSL).

1. The Dredging Paradox: The global maritime industry is currently engaged in a record-breaking 17\text{B}+ annual dredging campaign. While framed as "expansion," the raw necessity is driven by insufficient draft. Ships are being built deeper, while the "shallows" are physically drying up.

2. Island Accretion: Recent studies of over 700 Pacific and Indian Ocean atolls show that approximately 80\% have remained stable or increased in land area. This "biological climbing" suggests the ocean is not overtopping these structures; rather, the water level is receding or remaining static.

3. The "Acqua Bassa" Signal: Long-term tide gauges, such as those in Venice, have recently recorded extreme low-water events (Acqua Bassa) that leave canals dry. These are not mere weather anomalies but symptoms of a diminishing ocean volume that models attempt to mask with "isostatic adjustments."

IV. Geopolitical Realignment: The Scramble for the Deep

National strategic moves in 2026 reflect a "Receding Ocean" reality:

• The Greenland Doctrine: The United States' aggressive interest in Greenland is a move to secure high-latitude, deep-water ports. In a world where mid-latitude ports are becoming too shallow, the deep fjords of the North become the only viable hubs for global trade.

• Energy Autarky: The U.S. push for energy dominance and the shoring up of domestic oil supplies is a hedge against the collapse of traditional, shallow-water maritime trade routes.

• Asian Port Depth: China and Singapore are pivoting toward "Ultra-Deep" port infrastructure, acknowledging that the "shallows" of the 20th century are no longer navigable.

V. Conclusion

The "High Stand" of 1,000 years ago followed by the drop during the Little Ice Age proves that the ocean volume is highly sensitive to polar sequestration. The "Signal" from 2026—Earth’s acceleration, 5-foot polar snow accumulation, and the global dredging crisis—points to a singular conclusion: the oceans are not rising. They are being banked at the poles. The "rising" narrative is a product of mathematical modeling "noise" that ignores the raw, physical mechanics of a cooling, sequestering planet.