is evulution right? (only facts pls)

Sort:
go_d_lysop

evolution is just genetic impoverishment. a simple example is the primal wolf from which all dog breeds originate, he owned a huge gene pool from which humans bred the different types of dogs. But that doesn't mean that the dogs have evolved, it just means that they are genetically impoverished. Evolution is based on selection and mutation, all of which only ensure that the gene pool of the respective living being is reduced. Another example there is a fish that lost its eyes due to mutation, but that was an advantage for him because he lives in a cave that means that there was no light without it and he reduced the risk of injury because his eyes can no longer be damaged . nevertheless one has to realize that he has only lost something through mutation that means genetic impoverishment again.

TheHarbingerOfDoom
Each species has many variations. But does not become a different species. Environment and genes have an effect but a canine will always be a canine. This is what Darwin proposed originally isn’t it? Except he used different animals as an example. I think he looked at birds.

go_d_lysop

thats right but how do you think about the evolution it self, becaus i am christ and the reasons, i have mentiont before, why its seems wrong for me that the evolution is right.

ChessSensasian
TheHarbingerOfDoom wrote:
Each species has many variations. But does not become a different species. Environment and genes have an effect but a canine will always be a canine. This is what Darwin proposed originally isn’t it? Except he used different animals as an example. I think he looked at birds.

Darwinian evolution suggests that (in a very very simplified explanation) a species can turn into another species over many years through constant adaptations, both genetic and appearance changes based on the environment. Different characteristics distinguished different creatures of the same species, since certain features were more suitable for certain environments. This theory at its core is wrong from what scientists have discovered in the past couple of decades. As @TheHarbingerOfDoom said, a species will have variations due to adaptations to different environments, but there's no transitioning to another species. 

RuffledZest

Did you write evulution instead of evolution in the title intentionally?

RuffledZest

Or is it simply mistyped?

ChessSensasian
Yosef115 wrote:

Charles Darwin found the evolution

Technically, he didn't come up with evolution first...but his discoveries were more of a breakthrough for him during his time and later on. But eventually, there were major flaws about his theory