Is Santa still alive?

Sort:
Mathemagician_2

If he is, then people have written about him when he was alive.

Unlike with Jesus.

Mark12291229
Matthew? Mark? Luke? John?
shadowhb123
Nah he fell off the roof of some random dudes house.
Then that dude got the legendary loot drop of Santa’s coat.
Then he became Santa.
This is how the Santa species produces offspring.
Mathemagician_2
Mark12291229 wrote:
Matthew? Mark? Luke? John?

 

"Like the rest of the New Testament, the four gospels were written in Greek. The Gospel of Mark probably dates from c. AD 66–70, Matthew and Luke around AD 85–90, and John AD 90–110. Despite the traditional ascriptions, all four are anonymous and most scholars agree that none were written by eyewitnesses."

Please stop wasting Everybody's time.

Mathemagician_2

Conclusion;

Jesus might not have ever existed!

EscherehcsE

Mark12291229
#4 just because they were wrote after his lifetime didn’t mean he didn’t exist. Now you stop wasting everyone’s time before your pathetic thread gets locked
shadowhb123
It’s already gonna get locked seeing as it’s heavily packed with religious arguments
Mathemagician_2

I said no one wrote about him when he was alive.

You named the 4 Gospel Authors as reply, I refuted that.

And here you are, still wasting more of my time, and everybody elses.

Mark12291229
You failed to refute my second comment. You are therefore wasting my and everyone else’s time. You wasted everyone’s and the mods’ time by creating this thread in the first place. Go give yourself a cookie
Mathemagician_2
Mark12291229 wrote:
You failed to refute my second comment. You are therefore wasting my and everyone else’s time. You wasted everyone’s and the mods’ time by creating this thread in the first place. Go give yourself a cookie

Why did you author #4 then, to begin with??

shadowhb123
#9
Don’t act innocent. You clearly are instigating.
Mark I advise ignoring him
Mathemagician_2

Why did you make that inane post #2, if you are not wasting Everybody's time, Sweetie?

Mark12291229
I’m saying your premise of no one writing about Jesus in his life time= he didn’t exist is incorrect. Also, could not one of them known Greek? Could the scholars have found an already translated copy? Your description leaves much to be answered. Also most scholars hundreds of years ago believed the earth was flat. Soon they discovered they were wrong. Could there not have been a Bible written in Hebrew before it was translated to Greek (as of course they would be made in greek, that was the second language to Latin in the Roman Empire, however, Judea was since as a backwater providence and therefore would not be given as much importance, plus the smaller amount and lesser chance of ancient bibles being found in that language. Can you refute all of these claims?
Marksaheel

He's on Television RIGHT NOW!

Mark12291229
shadowhb123 wrote:
#9
Don’t act innocent. You clearly are instigating.
Mark I advise ignoring him

You’re probably right. Unless he makes a clear argument out of what I said my work is done here

Marksaheel

So is an ELF named Buddy.

Mathemagician_2

Nope, 

I said he 'MIGHT' not of existed, Not that he probably didn't.

Good bye.

Mathemagician_2

Wait.

"I’m saying your premise of no one writing about Jesus in his life time= he didn’t exist is incorrect."

You should work for the old news media, you slant things.

But your inability to comprehend reasonable logic would make you a lousy attorney.

All I said was "[On these basis] Jesus MIGHT not have existed. 

"Also, could not one of them known Greek?"

Yes, all 4 Gospels were written in Greek. "

Could the scholars have found an already translated copy?"

If they found one, say in Hebrew, why would they not mention it?

If they were that dishonest how should we believe them concerning Jesus?

"Your description leaves much to be answered."

No it doesn't.

I said "He might not have existed." If I knew you were going to do this  I would have "show some evidence that he does."

"Also most scholars hundreds of years ago believed the earth was flat."

And to this day some believe the Gospels.

This is your silliest point on this thread

"Soon they discovered they were wrong."

So???

"Could there not have been a Bible written in Hebrew before it was translated to Greek."

The Jewish Bible was written in Hebrew and that was recovered.

(as of course they would be made in greek, that was the second language to Latin in the Roman Empire, however, Judea was since as a backwater providence and therefore would not be given as much importance, plus the smaller amount and lesser chance of ancient bibles being found in that language. Can you refute all of these claims?

What Claims???

To be honest, Sir, you have not even made a claim.

Thanks for going easy on me, and giving an effortless workout for me Brain.

PS

Do not comment on any of my Math Threads.

Mark12291229
1. I said could a Hebrew Bible NOT have been found

2. https://infostudenti.net/en/why-are-there-no-roman-records-of-jesus/

View this