Is Santa still alive?
Sort:
Dec 22, 2022
0
#23
"however, Judea was since as a backwater providence and therefore would not be given as much importance, plus the smaller amount and lesser chance of ancient bibles being found in that language."
If they could not have found a living witness to Jesus, then there is no evidence he existed.
"Can you refute all of these claims"
What Claims?
Dec 22, 2022
0
#24
How many writers of the books of the Bible actually put their names? It was not meant to focus on the people that wrote them. Of course then it would be anonymous. It was said things like what you did would happen is happening more often. Now that the people who know Jesus or knew those people are gone you are taking advantage of that.
There’s no one alive today that knew Abraham Lincoln in person but he still existed.
I doubt you read either of my websites. They demonstrate how very few people knew him while he was alive, and therefore the earliest evidence may have not survived to this day.
You are unable to say that there was definitely never a original Mark, Luke, John, and Matthew in Hebrew. There may be no surviving copy today (surprising after 2000 years), but how would you know if there was never one to begin with?
There’s no one alive today that knew Abraham Lincoln in person but he still existed.
I doubt you read either of my websites. They demonstrate how very few people knew him while he was alive, and therefore the earliest evidence may have not survived to this day.
You are unable to say that there was definitely never a original Mark, Luke, John, and Matthew in Hebrew. There may be no surviving copy today (surprising after 2000 years), but how would you know if there was never one to begin with?
Dec 22, 2022
0
#25
If you cannot definitively prove that those accounts in Hebrew never existed (or that not of the above could speak Greek) then you cannot prove your own premise of all of the gospel being written after his lifetime.
Do most scholars agree the gospel was written afterwards: Yes
Do all believe that: No
Is there a way to definitely disprove what I said above: No
Then your premise is nothing more than a hypothesis
Do most scholars agree the gospel was written afterwards: Yes
Do all believe that: No
Is there a way to definitely disprove what I said above: No
Then your premise is nothing more than a hypothesis
There exists historical texts from Jewish and Roman historians that collaborate the existence of Jesus and the stories that are written in the Bible.
No they're not...just as stubborn
This person never even played a game of chess
Dec 22, 2022
0
#31
They got the ending they rightfully deserved. Couldn’t handle being refuted
Jan 25, 2023
0
#32
This is the Best they could come up with, to prove eyewitness testimony about Jesus.
And it's mainly BS
Jan 25, 2023
0
#33
ActivatePlan357 wrote:
There exists historical texts from Jewish and Roman historians that collaborate the existence of Jesus and the stories that are written in the Bible.
Link it.
Jan 25, 2023
0
#34
Mark12291229 wrote:
If you cannot definitively prove that those accounts in Hebrew never existed (or that not of the above could speak Greek) then you cannot prove your own premise of all of the gospel being written after his lifetime.
Do most scholars agree the gospel was written afterwards: Yes
Do all believe that: No
Is there a way to definitely disprove what I said above: No
Then your premise is nothing more than a hypothesis
Do most scholars agree the gospel was written afterwards: Yes
Do all believe that: No
Is there a way to definitely disprove what I said above: No
Then your premise is nothing more than a hypothesis
You must prove YOUR hypothesis, if you state one.
Jan 25, 2023
0
#35
Mark12291229 wrote:
How many writers of the books of the Bible actually put their names? It was not meant to focus on the people that wrote them. Of course then it would be anonymous. It was said things like what you did would happen is happening more often. Now that the people who know Jesus or knew those people are gone you are taking advantage of that.
There’s no one alive today that knew Abraham Lincoln in person but he still existed.
I doubt you read either of my websites. They demonstrate how very few people knew him while he was alive, and therefore the earliest evidence may have not survived to this day.
You are unable to say that there was definitely never a original Mark, Luke, John, and Matthew in Hebrew. There may be no surviving copy today (surprising after 2000 years), but how would you know if there was never one to begin with?
There’s no one alive today that knew Abraham Lincoln in person but he still existed.
I doubt you read either of my websites. They demonstrate how very few people knew him while he was alive, and therefore the earliest evidence may have not survived to this day.
You are unable to say that there was definitely never a original Mark, Luke, John, and Matthew in Hebrew. There may be no surviving copy today (surprising after 2000 years), but how would you know if there was never one to begin with?
Share just 1 page, of pamphlets written when Jesus was still alive.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judaea_(Roman_province)