Let's get it straight: En passant isn't cheating.

Sort:
st0ckfish
ChessSensasian wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ChessSensasian wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:

Soo, I think we can finally conclude that on peasant is indeed cheating, and if it isn't, it is definitely unsporting. 

Unsporting? En passant has been around since 15th century

Yes, unfortunately cheating was born at the same time as humankind. 

Which is why early chess players created the en passant move, which is deemed a legal move to use under certain circumstances.

its not legal, i got kicked out of a oturnament for playing it 

ZoomorBoom

well, you probably got kicked out for lying, since your showing me that you do, and that you suck at it

st0ckfish
ZoomorBoom wrote:

well, you probably got kicked out for lying, since your showing me that you do, and that you suck at it

my oponent played g7-g4 and i played hxg5. tell me whats wrong with that, HMM

ZoomorBoom

lying and accusing someone of hacking his unsporting, and your supposed to show sportmanship in tournaments

ZoomorBoom

once again, you probably got kicked for false accusations, just like what you're doing right now

2Ke21-0
ZoomorBoom wrote:

lying and accusing someone of hacking his unsporting, and your supposed to show sportmanship in tournaments

Well, hacking and cheating pawns are not considered unsporting, then? 

ZoomorBoom

who said it was hacking?

 

ZoomorBoom

Let's think of the two options

2Ke21-0
ZoomorBoom wrote:

who said it was hacking?

 

What else could it be? 

ZoomorBoom

1. Your lying

 

2. These hackers hacked into wooden chess boards, grandmasters minds chess.com lessons, every other chess website, and wikipedia

ZoomorBoom

those are the 2 options

 

ZoomorBoom

there's a 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% that it's just you lying

st0ckfish
ZoomorBoom wrote:

1. Your lying

 

2. These hackers hacked into wooden chess boards, chess.com lessons, every other chess website, and wikipedia

the latter duh

2Ke21-0

Smh 

Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch. 

ZoomorBoom

where did you get the "duh'

ZoomorBoom
Chess4PK wrote:

Smh 

Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch. 

 

hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule

 

Lc0_1
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:

Smh 

Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch. 

 

hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule

 

true?

2Ke21-0

Do you not get it? If you did on peasant in a real OTB tournament, you would get banned from cheating. Here, online, it's easier to get away with this hack. 

Platypus

shove off you have double account and you accuse us of cheating 13a10

Lc0_1
Chess4PK wrote:

Do you not get it? If you did on peasant in a real OTB tournament, you would get banned from cheating. Here, online, it's easier to get away with this hack. 

Ive played it quite a few times OTB and even with the arbiter watching, nothing happened.