Let's get it straight: En passant isn't cheating.

Sort:
Avatar of ZoomorBoom

well, you probably got kicked out for lying, since your showing me that you do, and that you suck at it

Avatar of st0ckfish
ZoomorBoom wrote:

well, you probably got kicked out for lying, since your showing me that you do, and that you suck at it

my oponent played g7-g4 and i played hxg5. tell me whats wrong with that, HMM

Avatar of ZoomorBoom

lying and accusing someone of hacking his unsporting, and your supposed to show sportmanship in tournaments

Avatar of ZoomorBoom

once again, you probably got kicked for false accusations, just like what you're doing right now

Avatar of 2Ke21-0
ZoomorBoom wrote:

lying and accusing someone of hacking his unsporting, and your supposed to show sportmanship in tournaments

Well, hacking and cheating pawns are not considered unsporting, then? 

Avatar of ZoomorBoom

who said it was hacking?

 

Avatar of ZoomorBoom

Let's think of the two options

Avatar of 2Ke21-0
ZoomorBoom wrote:

who said it was hacking?

 

What else could it be? 

Avatar of ZoomorBoom

1. Your lying

 

2. These hackers hacked into wooden chess boards, grandmasters minds chess.com lessons, every other chess website, and wikipedia

Avatar of ZoomorBoom

those are the 2 options

 

Avatar of ZoomorBoom

there's a 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% that it's just you lying

Avatar of st0ckfish
ZoomorBoom wrote:

1. Your lying

 

2. These hackers hacked into wooden chess boards, chess.com lessons, every other chess website, and wikipedia

the latter duh

Avatar of 2Ke21-0

Smh 

Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch. 

Avatar of ZoomorBoom

where did you get the "duh'

Avatar of ZoomorBoom
Chess4PK wrote:

Smh 

Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch. 

 

hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule

 

Avatar of Lc0_1
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:

Smh 

Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch. 

 

hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule

 

true?

Avatar of 2Ke21-0

Do you not get it? If you did on peasant in a real OTB tournament, you would get banned from cheating. Here, online, it's easier to get away with this hack. 

Avatar of Platypus

shove off you have double account and you accuse us of cheating 13a10

Avatar of Lc0_1
Chess4PK wrote:

Do you not get it? If you did on peasant in a real OTB tournament, you would get banned from cheating. Here, online, it's easier to get away with this hack. 

Ive played it quite a few times OTB and even with the arbiter watching, nothing happened.

Avatar of ZoomorBoom
Chess4PK wrote:

Do you not get it? If you did on peasant in a real OTB tournament, you would get banned from cheating. Here, online, it's easier to get away with this hack. 

 

Can you stop pulling out facts out of the top of your head? I'm in awe of your creativity, but it's getting irritating