sure, president Chess4PK
Let's get it straight: En passant isn't cheating.
Sort:
Chess4PK wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
Also, could you please stop editing my quotes? This is a violation of my personal silly laws.
lol
Jun 19, 2020
0
#145
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
You just did it again.
Jun 19, 2020
0
#146
Quote editing goes against the terms of service if misused and is a reportable offense.
Chess4PK wrote:
Quote editing goes against the terms of service if misused and is a reportable offense.
Where does it say that?
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
You just did it again.
Oh no, I am very sorry your majesty, I was blissfully unaware that your silly laws meant anything (they don't)
Jun 19, 2020
0
#153
Chess4PK wrote:
ChessSensasian wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
1_a31-0 wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
Smh
Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch.
hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule
hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!
If the entire world made it legal, then it is legal techniqually
What you don't understand is that the entire world has NOT made it legal.
Most people agree that en passant is a rule. Majority wins, and en passant is a rule. If majority of people started protesting that robbing a bank was legal, it would become legal
You should read my forum. There, you'll see that the majority of players, including titled players, agree that on peasant is not a legal move.
Strange that there are a lot of professional players that also say that en passant is a legal move. It's just not a very known one.
And that's probably their opinion that it shouldn't be a legal move
Hah! Are you challenging titled players in knowledge of the rules?
Yes I am.
If they are titled players, then they should be aware that en passant is a legal move.
Chess.com says so. Many professional and titled players use it and say it’s legal.
So am I supposed to believe you? So far, you have just stated opinions.
I posted the chess.com article about En passant, which says that the move is legit
Finally! Another person who has a brain!
1_a31-0 wrote:
How long will you keep this up?
gdzen wrote:
please someone tell me and help me to understand: how any other rule is different than en-passant rule? why all other rules are ok but this? please.
It’s a glitch not a rule!
Not to be toxic, but @Chess4PK, I think a reasoning part of your brain might have a little problem, please get it checked
Jun 19, 2020
0
#157
ChessSensasian wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ChessSensasian wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
1_a31-0 wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
Smh
Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch.
hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule
hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!
If the entire world made it legal, then it is legal techniqually
What you don't understand is that the entire world has NOT made it legal.
Most people agree that en passant is a rule. Majority wins, and en passant is a rule. If majority of people started protesting that robbing a bank was legal, it would become legal
You should read my forum. There, you'll see that the majority of players, including titled players, agree that on peasant is not a legal move.
Strange that there are a lot of professional players that also say that en passant is a legal move. It's just not a very known one.
And that's probably their opinion that it shouldn't be a legal move
Hah! Are you challenging titled players in knowledge of the rules?
Yes I am.
If they are titled players, then they should be aware that en passant is a legal move.
Chess.com says so. Many professional and titled players use it and say it’s legal.
So am I supposed to believe you? So far, you have just stated opinions.
I posted the chess.com article about En passant, which says that the move is legit
Did you just read the recent comments where an NM said the rule is legal?
Jun 19, 2020
0
#158
Jun 19, 2020
0
#159
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Not to be toxic, but @Chess4PK, I think a reasoning part of your brain might have a little problem, please get it checked
Reported. We were having a civilized conversation here and you intervened with a nasty personal attack.
Chess4PK wrote:
ChessSensasian wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ChessSensasian wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
1_a31-0 wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
Smh
Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch.
hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule
hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!
If the entire world made it legal, then it is legal techniqually
What you don't understand is that the entire world has NOT made it legal.
Most people agree that en passant is a rule. Majority wins, and en passant is a rule. If majority of people started protesting that robbing a bank was legal, it would become legal
You should read my forum. There, you'll see that the majority of players, including titled players, agree that on peasant is not a legal move.
Strange that there are a lot of professional players that also say that en passant is a legal move. It's just not a very known one.
And that's probably their opinion that it shouldn't be a legal move
Hah! Are you challenging titled players in knowledge of the rules?
Yes I am.
If they are titled players, then they should be aware that en passant is a legal move.
Chess.com says so. Many professional and titled players use it and say it’s legal.
So am I supposed to believe you? So far, you have just stated opinions.
I posted the chess.com article about En passant, which says that the move is legit
Did you just read the recent comments where an NM said the rule is legal?
The NM who strangly has close to exact same name as another person? Those don't mean anything @Chess4PK
Also, could you please stop editing my quotes? This is a violation of federal laws.