? they are an NM
Let's get it straight: En passant isn't cheating.
Sort:
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Not to be toxic, but @Chess4PK, I think a reasoning part of your brain might have a little problem, please get it checked
Reported. We were having a civilized conversation here and you intervened with a nasty personal attack.
Sure, I can report you right back for extensive flaming, because you kept on accusing people of hacking
Jun 19, 2020
0
#164
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ChessSensasian wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ChessSensasian wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
1_a31-0 wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
Smh
Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch.
hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule
hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!
If the entire world made it legal, then it is legal techniqually
What you don't understand is that the entire world has NOT made it legal.
Most people agree that en passant is a rule. Majority wins, and en passant is a rule. If majority of people started protesting that robbing a bank was legal, it would become legal
You should read my forum. There, you'll see that the majority of players, including titled players, agree that on peasant is not a legal move.
Strange that there are a lot of professional players that also say that en passant is a legal move. It's just not a very known one.
And that's probably their opinion that it shouldn't be a legal move
Hah! Are you challenging titled players in knowledge of the rules?
Yes I am.
If they are titled players, then they should be aware that en passant is a legal move.
Chess.com says so. Many professional and titled players use it and say it’s legal.
So am I supposed to believe you? So far, you have just stated opinions.
I posted the chess.com article about En passant, which says that the move is legit
Did you just read the recent comments where an NM said the rule is legal?
The NM who strangly has close to exact same name as another person? Those don't mean anything @Chess4PK
How does that not mean anything?
is something wrong? @1e41-O is a real NM. To achieve NM you obviously have to understand the rules, thus you are wrong.
brick is fruit
Jun 19, 2020
0
#167
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Not to be toxic, but @Chess4PK, I think a reasoning part of your brain might have a little problem, please get it checked
Reported. We were having a civilized conversation here and you intervened with a nasty personal attack.
Sure, I can report you right back for extensive flaming, because you kept on accusing people of hacking
This is not an offense if a specific person was not targetted.
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ChessSensasian wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ChessSensasian wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
1_a31-0 wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
Smh
Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch.
hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule
hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!
If the entire world made it legal, then it is legal techniqually
What you don't understand is that the entire world has NOT made it legal.
Most people agree that en passant is a rule. Majority wins, and en passant is a rule. If majority of people started protesting that robbing a bank was legal, it would become legal
You should read my forum. There, you'll see that the majority of players, including titled players, agree that on peasant is not a legal move.
Strange that there are a lot of professional players that also say that en passant is a legal move. It's just not a very known one.
And that's probably their opinion that it shouldn't be a legal move
Hah! Are you challenging titled players in knowledge of the rules?
Yes I am.
If they are titled players, then they should be aware that en passant is a legal move.
Chess.com says so. Many professional and titled players use it and say it’s legal.
So am I supposed to believe you? So far, you have just stated opinions.
I posted the chess.com article about En passant, which says that the move is legit
Did you just read the recent comments where an NM said the rule is legal?
The NM who strangly has close to exact same name as another person? Those don't mean anything @Chess4PK
How does that not mean anything?
Because it's obviously an alternate account
jason543 wrote:
? they are an NM
Who is an NM?
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Not to be toxic, but @Chess4PK, I think a reasoning part of your brain might have a little problem, please get it checked
Reported. We were having a civilized conversation here and you intervened with a nasty personal attack.
Sure, I can report you right back for extensive flaming, because you kept on accusing people of hacking
This is not an offense if a specific person was not targetted.
AKA people who agree with you
@ZoomorBoom, I can confirm they are all different accounts.
Jun 19, 2020
0
#173
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ChessSensasian wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ChessSensasian wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
1_a31-0 wrote:
ZoomorBoom wrote:
Chess4PK wrote:
Smh
Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch.
hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule
hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!
If the entire world made it legal, then it is legal techniqually
What you don't understand is that the entire world has NOT made it legal.
Most people agree that en passant is a rule. Majority wins, and en passant is a rule. If majority of people started protesting that robbing a bank was legal, it would become legal
You should read my forum. There, you'll see that the majority of players, including titled players, agree that on peasant is not a legal move.
Strange that there are a lot of professional players that also say that en passant is a legal move. It's just not a very known one.
And that's probably their opinion that it shouldn't be a legal move
Hah! Are you challenging titled players in knowledge of the rules?
Yes I am.
If they are titled players, then they should be aware that en passant is a legal move.
Chess.com says so. Many professional and titled players use it and say it’s legal.
So am I supposed to believe you? So far, you have just stated opinions.
I posted the chess.com article about En passant, which says that the move is legit
Did you just read the recent comments where an NM said the rule is legal?
The NM who strangly has close to exact same name as another person? Those don't mean anything @Chess4PK
How does that not mean anything?
Because it's obviously an alternate account
To get a title, you need to be verified by chess.com. I suggest learning how relevant things work before making accusatory comments.
Jun 19, 2020
0
#174
JustARandomPatzer wrote:
@ZoomorBoom, I can confirm they are all different accounts.
Of course!
Chess4PK wrote:
JustARandomPatzer wrote:
@ZoomorBoom, I can confirm they are all different accounts.
Of curse!
1e41-O wrote:
on posond bad
stroke?
1e41-O wrote:
i am offended to be compared to @cheeseforpeekay
Nani?
Smh
Has nobody ever told you that Wikipedia is unreliable? And yes, chess.com has created this fake rule to cheat rating points out of us innocents. It would take a poor sport and cheater to exploit the glitch.
hmmmmmmm... If everyone makes it so that en passant is a rule, then it is a rule
hey! advaith, lets go around robbing banks! we want to make it a rule, so now its legal!
If the entire world made it legal, then it is legal techniqually
What you don't understand is that the entire world has NOT made it legal.
Most people agree that en passant is a rule. Majority wins, and en passant is a rule. If majority of people started protesting that robbing a bank was legal, it would become legal
You should read my forum. There, you'll see that the majority of players, including titled players, agree that on peasant is not a legal move.
Strange that there are a lot of professional players that also say that en passant is a legal move. It's just not a very known one.
And that's probably their opinion that it shouldn't be a legal move
Hah! Are you challenging titled players in knowledge of the rules?