Merry Xmas and a Happy New Year.
Has Light got a decay factor?
Sort:
Perhaps I should have said 'Invisible Universe' instead of unseen. But, of course, it's not a universe that can't be seen because it's invisible. That would be silly. However there must be a Universe other than the one we know which is invisible to us for the Unified Model to work. So there is a universe that does exist that is invisible to us because it's invisible...to us. Though would be visible to those aliens in it. So wouldn't be invisible. That's assuming the Aliens have eyes to see. So as long as the Aliens have eyes to see the invisible universe is visible. You see?
Dec 20, 2017
0
#4365
Iknowthemoves wrote:
Merry Xmas and a Happy New Year.
....and to you too IKTM's 
.
The latest data throws up yet more unpredicted results. Further questioning the Big Bang model. The only way to explain using that outdated model is to suggest there must be new physics not predicted by the standard model ! However the new data is consistent with the Unified Model. There might be, hither to unknown particles, but they aren't needed to explain the results if the Unified Model is used.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-42630399
Whoever wrote the comment on Quantum Tunnelling and space and time dimensions being different, please write to me. Thanks
Do you mean The force against gravity or @PaulB theory ? Which one ?
My features are unable to write/receive a message.
I may have solved the problem of "spooky action at a distance" .
For the Unified Model to work there needs to be another dimension for sub atomic particles to leave and re-enter our universe . "Spooky Action at a Distance" would need a similar method of re-location.
What if that other dimension is TIMELESS ? If there is no time in that dimension a particle can be anywhere, anywhere in the universe INSTANTLY...because there's no time there !
Just an idle musing for a wet sunday in Weymouth...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5341035/Dwarf-satellites-orbit-galaxy-bizarre-ordered-fashion.html
Dark Matter proven not to exist. But more importantly the orderly movement of these dwarf galaxies are not predicted by the inflationary model. Yet more evidence that the Big Bollox theory is just that...bollox ! (That's the actual technical term for that theory...ahem !)
could prove dark matter doesn't exist .... could prove is no proof at all.
Idle musing again for a sunday in Weymouth.
Perhaps there isn't another dimension but a state of being within the current dimension that doesn't have time. Would that work for the Unified Model and Spooky action? It would require energy to exist and not exist and be connected to every part of the universe at the same moment in time. A bit like a worm hole.
Ancient galaxy that doesn't fit the Big Bang model
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2018/arrested-development-hubble-finds-relic-galaxy-close-to-home
More idle musings for a snowy sunday afternoon .
What if the LAW that states that energy can't be created or destroyed is slightly wrong !
Logic says that it MUST be slightly wrong , in some way , otherwise the Universes existance can't really be explained.
Iknowthemoves wrote:
More idle musings for a snowy sunday afternoon .
What if the LAW that states that energy can't be created or destroyed is slightly wrong !
Logic says that it MUST be slightly wrong , in some way , otherwise the Universes existance can't really be explained.
_________________________________________
The short answer to your assertion is 'SYMMETRY", that logic dictates that there must be in some way, something, slightly wrong with the law of the conservation of energy is from the mathematical, the wireframe of the universe,: As you write, "What if the law that states that energy can't be created or destroyed is slightly wrong!" Further, you assert that, "Logic says that it MUST be slightly wrong, in some way, otherwise the universes existence can't really be explained"
Emmy Noether, a contemporary of Albert Einstein wrote that mathematical treatise on how symmetry is intrisincally involved in the conservation of energy law.
Please feel free to communicate with me, and thank you for your excellent question.
It wasn't an assertion ! it was a question..a postulation..an idle musing....just an idea...a thought.
Nothing more.
... AND STOP SHOUTING...FFS
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/mar/28/galaxy-without-any-dark-matter-baffles-astronomers
Latest data shows a galaxy without the mysterious 'Dark Matter'. Or could it be that DM doesn't exist and that this galaxy has very little dust or Black holes...which is what DM really is.
https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2018/04/black-hole-stellar-binary-stars-milky-way-galaxy/
The missing baryonic matter ascribed to silly Dark Matter which doesn't exist?
Brief xmas recap on the story so far.
1, Dark Matter can't be found and the newest modelling doesn't require it
2, Dark Energy can't be found and the newest modelling doesn't require it
3. Latest data on the number of Galaxies is 2 TRILLION and counting. Making the Universe much bigger than was predicted by the Big Bang.
4. Latest data of local stars suggests some are as old as the predicted age of the Universe suggesting the Universe is much older than current modelling predicts.
5.The micro wave back ground radiation ,formally considered to be the echo of the Big Bang ,could now be attributed to extremely distant Galaxies where the only light left to get through the cosmic medium are Micro waves. All other light being stopped or currently too weak to detect.
The light hasn't 'decayed' into micro waves it's the only radiation left from the rest of the unseen Universe to get this far.