Paradoxical success: objective or subjective?
Sort:
TRUE Success Is E V E R Y O N E Successful !
Perhaps you can blap some rebuttal?
It's all subjective. All of it.
I don't think there is much of anything in social philosophy (or human behavior) you can point to that is objective. Everything is relative to something else. We know this by way of physics. It extrapolates to your topic.
MarkofGreatness wrote:
You need to have some evidence before I can even accept yours as a viewpoint. Also, you committed the logical fallacy of “shifting the burden of proof.” You have the positive side of the argument and must prove it, as I have the negative side and it is impossible to prove a negative.
Were I to ask you what it is you disagree with my acknowledging of Success, would you answer?
Objectively - the thread is an utter failure based on the person who wrote it.
That’s clearly an opposing mark from greatness, there, storm.
You don’t provide me any evidence that you are luvonox, therefore you are not luvonox
That’s not evidence: any viewer can assume that. I could say the same. Also, you stated that luv doesn’t have an alt, even though he 1. has alts and 2. you’re claiming to be his alt.
MarkofGreatness wrote:
I disagree with your acknowledging of success because you say something you want taken as a fact, yet you provide me no reason to believe it.
You mean that you actually don’t acknowledge such common sense?
Think of the word ‘SUCCESS’, then think if everyone were Successful, this would be of course under different fairing laws than present, you would of course have reached True S U C C E S S .
Mankind in general
😂 …..and not some other development manifesting…
Lmao 😂 …I just stepped into the forums area dude
MarkofGreatness wrote:
That’s an ad hominem attack. You’re trying to insult me by saying that I don’t acknowledge common sense but the fact/statement you give is not accepted as common sense. Also, you aren’t answering the questions I asked. I asked whether success is objective or subjective and in what ways, not what success is for a society
That’s nonsense.. I merely expressed what I clearly recognize True Success to be. I do agree your OP had not asked directly that, yet I still felt to add what I know expresses True Success in such absolute. I’m still some confused why you do not, yeah.
Please Sign Up to comment.
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.
Based on this, then can a job be both completed and uncompleted at the same time? Say for instance, a person is unable to do a task to its “true” completion, but they do it to the best of their ability. Is the task completed or not? Or is it both at the same time, a seeming palindrome? Possibly, is the job then completed not objectively, but subjectively?
This brings up a further thought: can a job be completed for one person yet not for another? And does this mean that there are different standards of completion for everyone, so while a job may be completely undone, according to the scale of the person doing the job it actually is?
Tl;dr: Is success measured objectively, subjectively, or both? And if both, does it change based on the task, or is it paradoxically both completed and finished at the same time? And if so, can a job be completed for one person but not for another?