people below 300 elo should quit chess.prove me wrong

Sort:
Avatar of thrillpillgilljill

btw the 400th comment here

Avatar of Michael_on_chess

oh i wish i was

Avatar of DrSpudnik
Michael_on_chess wrote:

oh i wish i was

Wish you were what? Banned from chess?

Avatar of Michael_on_chess

400th comment

Avatar of GM_TillerJams

Everyone starts somewhere lol... also you dont have to be good to enjoy something.

Avatar of Michael_on_chess

yes

Avatar of KyngKiller

Why does this forum exist?

Avatar of GM_TillerJams
KyngKiller wrote:

Why does this forum exist?

Fr tho haha

Avatar of Josh11live
How to get the mods?
Avatar of KyngKiller

Forgive me if it would be considered rude but the whole premise of this forum is idiotic. It doesn’t make sense that someone should quit cause if some arbitrary number and this dude is the one making claims so he should be the one backing up his claims.

Avatar of M4NG0ES-4ever
This forum was made as a joke to get an achievement, so
Avatar of SacrifycedStoat
Many people have proven you wrong.

If you want comments, make a game on OTF
Avatar of C00lkid_0
Fr3nchToastCrunch wrote:

Ehh, I don't know about that. I think if you're still below 500 after a few months, you're obviously not even trying. (And if you are, chess is clearly not for you.) But I've seen things happen before.


Avatar of C00lkid_0
TheEloCollector1 wrote:
This forum was made as a joke to get an achievement, so


Avatar of C00lkid_0
KyngKiller wrote:

Forgive me if it would be considered rude but the whole premise of this forum is idiotic. It doesn’t make sense that someone should quit cause if some arbitrary number and this dude is the one making claims so he should be the one backing up his claims.


Avatar of LoudMightyChimp

Since when is it your game to prevent others from playing?

If they want to play they play

People still have fun even if they are low ranked

Doesn't make their chess games and enjoyment any 'lesser'

Try and improve the world, don't ruin it

Avatar of TheCrackedBishop

half of low rated players players should not even be low rated. I know this because I am one. Take this example: I have a rapid rating of 230, and I play an opponent who is 340. I beat him. My new rating? 238 (plus 8)

Avatar of KyngKiller
TheCrackedBishop wrote:

half of low rated players players should not even be low rated. I know this because I am one. Take this example: I have a rapid rating of 230, and I play an opponent who is 340. I beat him. My new rating? 238 (plus 8)

So you think if you beat someone of a certain Elo you should be that Elo or higher? That seems kinda flawed. One time a drew an 1800 hundred but that doesn’t mean I should be one. I am no where near that skill level

Avatar of Michael_on_chess

no you just deleted your comment

Avatar of Salopian57

Everyone has a right to play this great game regardless of how low there rating may be and anyone who thinks because a person's rating is too low and suggests they should not continue enjoying our great game should consider instead of running those low rated players down instead offer encouragement not segregation?!

This forum topic has been locked