people below 300 elo should quit chess.prove me wrong
Sort:
Apr 22, 2025
0
#22
All is a process of learning, I entered in 400 Elo chess at the beggining and now I had win 2000 (few times not too much but I did it with a stimated rating of 2300 ELO chess)
In my opinion, the rating should not matter in chess. (I have met silver league people near 300)
Apr 22, 2025
0
#25
I got something to say that might be shocking.
They can improve by playing more chess games.
Those trolls like Stern, Chomper, and that other chomper supporter are wrong and proves they just hate low elo players. Also Stern is gone, but he deserve it.
Apr 22, 2025
0
#26
OP has it backwards, nobody has to prove anything; OP made the statement, it's up to him to prove he's right. The rest of us will judge his effort.
CHICKEN JOCKEY
No one should quit at any rating I started chess at a rating of 151 and was at the level for almost a year look at me now
Apr 23, 2025
0
#30
badger_song wrote:
OP has it backwards, nobody has to prove anything; OP made the statement, it's up to him to prove he's right. The rest of us will judge his effort.
But he wants us to prove him wrong. He wants us to do the work, while we either responds with something pointless or jist doesn't respond at all.
If you make 300 as the lower limit, it will serve as a culling... As players continue to lose until they reach the minimum, they will be culled and removed... You also need a clear space where the rating fluctuations would not reach the culling line. This region must have an average of 300 elo... Therefore, based on the graph of players elo density, approximately half of players would be culled...
Apr 23, 2025
0
#32
Troll-posts aside, it's silly to tie whether or not someone should play a game based upon some artificial rating system. The only factor determining whether someone should be playing is whether they enjoy doing so. If all the 100-300 elo players enjoy chess they should all play. Furthermore, they should recruit as many other potential sub-300 players they can find.
I know everyone can play chess at any level and they can enjoy playing chess at any level i respect the 300 elo or below that elo i am not serious about the post and didnt think that it would get this attencion
Apr 23, 2025
0
#36
About 68% of chess.com users are below 300 not because they are bad or anything but because they can't deticate their lives to chess, many people (including me) play chess as a hobby, I play to take a break from my school studies (I'm 13), I don't think we should judge by rating, even magnus must be below 300 at a point, say he should've quit chess too
Apr 23, 2025
0
#37
Nahiplaychess3 wrote:
i wrote this artical to get an achievment i was not serious about it
The prove me wrong part sounds pretty serious
Apr 23, 2025
0
#38
They should not because if there they’re 300, they probably haven’t tried to improve.
If they try to improve and are U200, chess is not for them.
Not making one-move blunders and punishing opponent’s one-move blunders will get you to 500. You wouldn’t even need opening principles.
If they try to improve and are U200, chess is not for them.
Not making one-move blunders and punishing opponent’s one-move blunders will get you to 500. You wouldn’t even need opening principles.
good thing there is not system in play that matches you based on your elo
So everyone at 301 ELO would be at the bottom, gradually reducing them to 300 ELO and elimination, until everyone is 300 ELO and banned from chess forever?