‘Proof’ God exists

Sort:
BasixWhiteBoy
Alpine wassup
Pegusu
Alp1ne14 wrote:
I made it, someone else.

Thanks for having the guts to post this forum - you have my respect!thumbup

BasixWhiteBoy
The truth is that there isn’t real proof that his is real or that anything is real. No one truly knows how we got here to begin with. Thanks for posting this forum to show your views
Alp1ne14
Can someone fight me on it already
Alp1ne14
I mean, read the paper and fight me on it.
BasixWhiteBoy
I can’t because I’m still figuring out my religion and I slightly believe in god and the rest of me thinks something else
Alp1ne14
The paper, it’s anything but boring. I can tell you that. Give it a read, and you will be blown away.
BasixWhiteBoy
Hm ok
Pegusu
Alp1ne14 wrote:
The paper, it’s anything but boring. I can tell you that. Give it a read, and you will be blown away.

Is this for a speech and debate class?

Alp1ne14
No.
BasixWhiteBoy
It’s very interesting
Alp1ne14
This is not a standard paper. It’s a technical proof. Seriously, read it.
BasixWhiteBoy
I read it
BasixWhiteBoy
Are you like a grown man?
ChessDude009

Can you please summarize your point?
As a somewhat-nonbeliever, this piece of evidence is too convoluted to read and think about right now.

Anyways, it seems like you are stating that some kind of mathematical coincidence links up with numbers that are important.
A lot of sentences seem like they are diverted from the very script you are trying to prove. Is there any way you can prove it with a piece of evidence everyone can find on their own?

I doubt this is possible, but I welcome you to try.

ChessDude009

There are solid pieces of evidence I could tell you that disprove an omnipotent god, all with a simple (2-3 sentence) proof that you can logically reason in your own head.

Make your own piece of evidence easier to understand and I will read it thoroughly.

WTFrickenA

In Numerology HOLY totals 6.

H/8 O/6 L/3 Y/7

MarkoHoog

I would like to point out that in your paper you use the Myers-Briggs personalities to give a 'solid ground' to it, however, the personalities are not backed by research and are generally considered pseudoscience and therefore cannot be reliable for basing your statements off of.

WTFrickenA

Interesting 😂

Alp1ne14
It’s pseudoscience, yes. But there’s no coincidence four was chosen.
This forum topic has been locked