Sexism by Chess.com?

Sort:
ChampoftheBepoCamp
December_TwentyNine wrote:

CHANGE YOUR PFP TO DEPRESSED MANGA GIRL AMD EVERYTHING CHESS.COM IS FREE

WOOT WOOT!!!!

Er nuut nuut

ChampoftheBepoCamp
LeviathanLily wrote:
December_TwentyNine wrote:

I wasn't being violent sweetheart.

I said I could sneak in his safe and take his stuff and do whatever I want with them - to get revenge.

EXACTLY

Er why though... was he being mean, physical? If being naughty a consensual punishment can do like ahem a ...

EscherehcsE
ChampoftheCommieCamp wrote:
EscherehcsE wrote:

Well, I guess Chess.com can be sexist if it wants to be. They makes tha rulez...

Er making sexist rules cuz you can ahem! Champ say nope

Champ don't carry no weight here...

I don't either, but that's beside the point...

ChampoftheBepoCamp
EscherehcsE wrote:
ChampoftheCommieCamp wrote:
EscherehcsE wrote:

Well, I guess Chess.com can be sexist if it wants to be. They makes tha rulez...

Er making sexist rules cuz you can ahem! Champ say nope

Champ don't carry no weight here...

The Champ is the equalizer, the one in one, the undertaker... the best there is, the best there was, the best there ever will be

ron10023
ChampoftheCommieCamp wrote:
EscherehcsE wrote:
ChampoftheCommieCamp wrote:
EscherehcsE wrote:

Well, I guess Chess.com can be sexist if it wants to be. They makes tha rulez...

Er making sexist rules cuz you can ahem! Champ say nope

Champ don't carry no weight here...

The Champ is the equalizer, the one in one, the undertaker... the best there is, the best there was, the best there ever will be

best, just after peppa pig =)

ChampoftheBepoCamp
ron10023 wrote:
ChampoftheCommieCamp wrote:
EscherehcsE wrote:
ChampoftheCommieCamp wrote:
EscherehcsE wrote:

Well, I guess Chess.com can be sexist if it wants to be. They makes tha rulez...

Er making sexist rules cuz you can ahem! Champ say nope

Champ don't carry no weight here...

The Champ is the equalizer, the one in one, the undertaker... the best there is, the best there was, the best there ever will be

best, just after peppa pig =)

and don't forget george the gentlebabe

ChampoftheBepoCamp
December_TwentyNine wrote:
ChampoftheCommieCamp wrote:

Er why though... was he being mean, physical? If being naughty a consensual punishment can do like ahem a ...

Because a woman can love a man so much, that when he breaks his trust - when he does something so bad - it crushes her. She loses her mind and can do almost anything.

It's a woman's world hunnie - this is why Mena and Women are treated differently because they reach the precipice differently

Um example feller...

ron10023
December_TwentyNine wrote:

Women, are by general , loving creatures. They as mothers love their children (especially the ones they gave birth to) and can form strong bonds with other women. They understand how relationships work better than men do, and when they finally find a man that has the strength qualities that she's looking for, she can trust easily. Actually, some women are naïve and can trust all too easy. A relationship is truly about the woman's feelings.

Now consider this. 

Let's say for example that I actually loved my husbands instead of  using them for material purposes.

And let's say that this husband romanced and gave me affection for a period of time.

And let's just say, that I caught him with someone, other than myself.

At this point, I can get so angry at the husband, that I can do various things - go on chess.com and tell the forum about it, cut all my hair off, gain lots of wait, or nag him to death. - or a combination of 2 or all of those things. When just yesterday I was nice and sweet to him.

That can be done a man too, nagging or making forums about him, not so much, but you can replace that with getting drunk or something =)

ron10023

For example, no one did anything to me, absolutely nothing, but I am going to cut my hair today =)

ChampoftheBepoCamp
December_TwentyNine wrote:

Women, are by general , loving creatures. They as mothers love their children (especially the ones they gave birth to) and can form strong bonds with other women. They understand how relationships work better than men do, and when they finally find a man that has the strength qualities that she's looking for, she can trust easily. Actually, some women are naïve and can trust all too easy. A relationship is truly about the woman's feelings.

Now consider this. 

Let's say for example that I actually loved my husbands instead of  using them for material purposes.

And let's say that this husband romanced and gave me affection for a period of time.

And let's just say, that I caught him with someone, other than myself.

At this point, I can get so angry at the husband, that I can do various things - go on chess.com and tell the forum about it, cut all my hair off, gain lots of wait, or nag him to death. - or a combination of 2 or all of those things. When just yesterday I was nice and sweet to him.

er... nopey

ChampoftheBepoCamp

Some women wanna go bald

ChampoftheBepoCamp

65ef00448d21c7dbfc2d5a66a8ed107a7693c93e.gif

UnclePeet
Like it or not…there is truth to this topic’s OP
ChampoftheBepoCamp
UnclePeet wrote:
Like it or not…there is truth to this topic’s OP

yes I as the champ support feminism and equalism! #peppalogic

ChampoftheBepoCamp

peet did you hear about the 18 year wrestler girl who got shot to death 7 times I think outside her car or something sad.png

Fancy_world_funny

Hey bro thanks for friend request

Problem5826
ChampoftheCommieCamp wrote:

Hello there landlubbers... as I was surfing the chess.com support pages, I came across the benefits for titled players. Where basically anyone with a certified titled like International Master could receive lifetime diamond membership here.

Now this favors women quite more than men... as the 3 lowest titles are: (from highest to lowest)

  1. Candidate Master : 2200 FIDE
  2. Women FIDE Master : 2100 FIDE
  3. Women Candidate master : 2000 FIDE

Women with a FIDE rating of 2000 or 2100 can leap past the men... and get that diamond membership! Ahem sexism...

Source

 

Don't be a chess professional. Don't enroll your children into chess academies. etc

Problem5826
ron10023 wrote:

You might want to watch this =)

 

I'm far from a feminist.

That's a genuinely distasteful event sponsor.

But then again, you also get McDonalds sponsoring the olympics. And Ronaldo removing Coca Cola at the last Euros.

ChampoftheBepoCamp
Fancy_world_funny wrote:

Hey bro thanks for friend request

lel k you changed your name

ChampoftheBepoCamp
Problem5826 wrote:
ChampoftheCommieCamp wrote:

Hello there landlubbers... as I was surfing the chess.com support pages, I came across the benefits for titled players. Where basically anyone with a certified titled like International Master could receive lifetime diamond membership here.

Now this favors women quite more than men... as the 3 lowest titles are: (from highest to lowest)

  1. Candidate Master : 2200 FIDE
  2. Women FIDE Master : 2100 FIDE
  3. Women Candidate master : 2000 FIDE

Women with a FIDE rating of 2000 or 2100 can leap past the men... and get that diamond membership! Ahem sexism...

Source

 

Don't be a chess professional. Don't enroll your children into chess academies. etc

?